Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 19:10:9-19.
doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S150428. eCollection 2018.

Calculating reading ease score of patient package inserts in Iran

Vahideh Zarea Gavgani  1   2 , Sedigheh Mirzadeh-Qasabeh  1 , Jalal Hanaee  3   4 , Hadi Hamishehkar  5
Affiliations

Calculating reading ease score of patient package inserts in Iran

Vahideh Zarea Gavgani et al. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. .

Abstract

Background: The patient package inserts (PPIs), which contain the necessary information about medications intended for patients, need to be expressed in a clear language comprehensible to everyone.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the readability and understandability of the drug package inserts for the inexpert people.

Methods: The readability of the 158 PPIs of the 33 drugs, registered and manufactured in Iran, was calculated. The main criterion for selecting PPIs to include in this study was of those top-selling drugs during the year 2015 according to the Social Security Organization in Iran. The PPIs were collected from the pharmacies of the three major cities, namely, Tabriz, Ardabil and Meshgin Shahr. Then, using the Flesch-Dayani readability (FDR) tool adjusted for the Persian language, the average number of the words and syllables was counted to calculate and grade the readability score of the selected PPIs.

Results: This study showed that the average FDR readability score for all the 33 drugs is 52.52, which are graded 10th-11th. Of the PPIs, 70.89% were difficult to read, and on average, the readability of the PPIs was five times difficult than the standard ones. Only 13.92% PPIs were suitable for the 5th-7th grade, and 15.19% of the package inserts ranked in the 8th-9th reading grade.

Conclusion: A considerable number of the PPIs in Iran have low readability level and were not suitable for the inexpert readers. Since the treatment cost is very high, people tend to use medications arbitrarily or simply use old prescriptions. This study suggests the necessity of a major improvement in the readability level of the PPIs in order to ensure the usefulness of the PPIs to the majority of the consumers.

Keywords: Flesch–Dayani indicator; Flesch–Dayani readability; drug guide; drug package insert; leaflet; patient package inserts; pharmaceutical brochures; readability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

    1. Singh KR, Munshi R, Arora D. Assessment of the degree of awareness among physicians and patients about drug package inserts. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2016;7(3):1338.
    1. Vander Stichele RH. Impact of written drug information in patient package inserts Acceptance and benefit/risk perception. Gent: Academia Press Scientific Publishers; 2004.
    1. Dass AS, Sarala N, Bhuvana K. Analysis of package inserts of drugs utilized in a tertiary care hospital. J Young Pharm. 2016;8(3):275.
    1. Gupta V, Pathak S. Assessment of awareness and knowledge about package inserts amongst medical students: a questionnaire based study. IOSR J Pharm. 2012;2(2):215–217.
    1. Piñero-López MÁ, Modamio P, Lastra CF, Mariño EL. Readability assessment of package inserts of biological medicinal products from the European medicines agency website. Drug Saf. 2014;37(7):543–554. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources