Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;2(2):98-106.
doi: 10.6000/1927-7229.2013.02.02.6.

Cancer Screening Among U.S. Medicaid Enrollees with Chronic Comorbidities or Residing in Long-Term Care Facilities

Affiliations

Cancer Screening Among U.S. Medicaid Enrollees with Chronic Comorbidities or Residing in Long-Term Care Facilities

Michael T Halpern et al. J Anal Oncol. 2013.

Abstract

Background: Ensuring appropriate cancer screenings among low-income persons with chronic conditions and persons residing in long-term care (LTC) facilities presents special challenges. This study examines the impact of having chronic diseases and of LTC residency status on cancer screening among adults enrolled in Medicaid, a joint state-federal government program providing health insurance for certain low-income individuals in the U.S.

Methods: We used 2000-2003 Medicaid data for Medicaid-only beneficiaries and merged 2003 Medicare-Medicaid data for dually-eligible beneficiaries from four states to estimate the likelihood of cancer screening tests during a 12-month period. Multivariate regression models assessed the association of chronic conditions and LTC residency status with each type of cancer screening.

Results: LTC residency was associated with significant reductions in screening tests for both Medicaid-only and Medicare-Medicaid enrollees; particularly large reductions were observed for receipt of mammograms. Enrollees with multiple chronic comorbidities were more likely to receive colorectal and prostate cancer screenings and less likely to receive Papanicolaou (Pap) tests than were those without chronic conditions.

Conclusions: LTC residents have substantial risks of not receiving cancer screening tests. Not performing appropriate screenings may increase the risk of delayed/missed diagnoses and could increase disparities; however, it is also important to consider recommendations to appropriately discontinue screening and decrease the risk of overdiagnosis. Although anecdotal reports suggest that patients with serious comorbidities may not receive regular cancer screening, we found that having chronic conditions increases the likelihood of certain screening tests. More work is needed to better understand these issues and to facilitate referrals for appropriate cancer screenings.

Keywords: Healthcare Disparities; Mass Screening; Medicaid; Neoplasms; Nursing Homes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Logistic Regression Analysis of Rates of Cancer Screening Tests for Medicaid Only (Non-Dual) Enrollees (Odds Ratios and Upper 95% Confidence Intervals)
Regression analyses controlled for age, age squared, sex, race/ethnicity, urban-rural residence status, state, number of chronic conditions (LTC study regressions only) and number of outpatient physician visits (chronic condition study regressions only). LTC regressions utilized non-LTC residents as the reference group; chronic condition regressions utilized individuals with zero chronic conditions as the reference group. All odds ratios are statistically significant at p<0.0001 except for CRC screening among LTC residents (not significant), Pap test among LTC residents (p=0.0006), prostate cancer screening among LTC residents (not significant) and mammography among enrollees with four or more chronic conditions (p=0.01).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Logistic Regression Analysis of Rates of Cancer Screening Tests for Dual Medicare-Medicaid Enrollees (Odds Ratios and Upper 95% Confidence Intervals)
Regression analyses controlled for age, age squared, sex, race/ethnicity, urban-rural residence status, state, number of chronic conditions (LTC study regressions only) and number of outpatient physician visits (chronic condition study regressions only). LTC regressions utilized non-LTC residents as the reference group; chronic condition regressions utilized individuals with zero chronic conditions as the reference group. All odds ratios are statistically significant at p<0.0001 except for mammography among enrollees with 2–3 chronic conditions (p=0.03) and Pap test among enrollees with 2–3 chronic conditions (not significant).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Welch HG, Black WC. Overdiagnosis in cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:605–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djq099. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Castellano PZ, Wenger NK, Graves WL. Adherence to screening guidelines for breast and cervical cancer in postmenopausal women with coronary heart disease: an ancillary study of volunteers for hers. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2001;10:451–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/152460901300233920. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heflin MT, Pollak KI, Kuchibhatla MN, Branch LG, Oddone EZ. The impact of health status on physicians' intentions to offer cancer screening to older women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61:844–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gerona/61.8.844. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McBean AM, Yu X. The underuse of screening services among elderly women with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:1466–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc06-2233. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jaen CR, Stange KC, Nutting PA. Competing demands of primary care: a model for the delivery of clinical preventive services. J Fam Pract. 1994;38:166–71. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources