Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Feb;7(1):12-17.
doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.12.13.

Prostate cancer screening: what can we learn from randomised trials?

Anssi Auvinen  1
Affiliations
Review

Prostate cancer screening: what can we learn from randomised trials?

Anssi Auvinen. Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

In this article, the principle of randomised trials are first described and then prostate cancer screening trials published to date are evaluated based on these principles. A summary of the randomised prostate cancer screening is provided. The conclusion that can be made from the results of the screening trials, as well as limitations of the evidence and open questions are outlined in the end.

Keywords: Prostate cancer screening; effectiveness; screening trials; validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chalmers I. Development of fair tests of treatment. Lancet 2014;383:1713-4. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60821-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Spall HG, Toren A, Kiss A, et al. Eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials published in high-impact general medical journals. JAMA 2007;297:1233-40. 10.1001/jama.297.11.1233 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blümle A, Meerpohl JJ, Rücker G, et al. Reporting of eligibility criteria of randomised trials. BMJ 2011;342:d1828. 10.1136/bmj.d1828 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Savović J, Jones H, Altman D, et al. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized controlled trials. Ann Intern Med 2012;157:429-38. 10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00537 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Page MJ, Higgins JO, Clayton G, et al. Empirical evidence of study design biases in randomised trials. PLoS One 2016;11:e0159267. 10.1371/journal.pone.0159267 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources