Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 14:8:62.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00062. eCollection 2018.

Biotherapies in Solid Tumors: Are Negative Results Still of Low Priority for Publication?

Alessandro Ottaiano  1 , Antonino Cassata  1 , Monica Capozzi  1 , Chiara De Divitiis  1 , Alfonso De Stefano  1 , Antonio Avallone  1
Affiliations

Biotherapies in Solid Tumors: Are Negative Results Still of Low Priority for Publication?

Alessandro Ottaiano et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

In 2005, we performed the largest survey on clinical trials of biotherapies for all solid tumors and found indirect evidence of a publication bias: editors of medical journals were more prone to publish positive results independently from the quality of the studies. We collected data from 2003 to 2015 in 487 studies, and the publication bias previously described was not found in the years between 2010 and 2015: this could be related to changes and/or innovations in the guidelines and editorial policies of oncology journals occurred over the last years.

Keywords: biotherapies; methodology; publication bias; solid tumors; survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ottaiano A, Mollo E, Di Lorenzo G, Pisano C, Di Maio M, Barletta E, et al. Prospective clinical trials of biotherapies in solid tumors: a 5-year survey. Cancer Immunol Immunother (2005) 54:44–50.10.1007/s00262-004-0567-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ottaiano A, Castello G, Ascierto PA. Evidence of publication bias in clinical trials of biotherapies for solid tumors. Cancer (2005) 103:653.10.1002/cncr.20835 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, Matthews DR. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet (1991) 337:867–72.10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-Y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kjaergard LL, Als-Nielsen B. Association between competing interests and authors’ conclusions: epidemiological study of randomised clinical trials published in the BMJ. BMJ (2002) 325:249.10.1136/bmj.325.7358.249 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kicinski M. Publication bias in recent meta-analyses. PLoS One (2013) 8:e81823. 10.1371/journal.pone.0081823. eCollection 2013. Erratum in PLoS One (2014) 9.10.1371/annotation/a65c0f61-eb99-42f0-828b-5a8662bce4f7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources