Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 12:6:54.
doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00054. eCollection 2018.

Stress Signals During Sucking Activity Are Associated With Longer Transition Time to Full Oral Feeding in Premature Infants

Affiliations

Stress Signals During Sucking Activity Are Associated With Longer Transition Time to Full Oral Feeding in Premature Infants

You Gyoung Yi et al. Front Pediatr. .

Abstract

Several treatments have been proposed to shorten the time to the attainment of full oral feeding (FOF) for premature infants, but there are only a few evaluation methods useful in estimating predictors of this period. We investigated whether specific items within the disorganized sucking patterns described by the Neonatal Oral-Motor Assessment Scale (NOMAS) could estimate the time to FOF in preterm infants with feeding difficulty. Preterm infants diagnosed with a disorganized sucking pattern in the NOMAS evaluation before 50 weeks of postmenstrual age were included. Video recordings of at least 2 min of oral feeding were further analyzed retrospectively by two assessors and the premature infants who exhibited disorganized sucking patterns (n = 109) were divided into three clusters (clusters 2-4). The observational items compatible with disorganization in the original NOMAS were divided into three groups: cluster 2 (disorganized: arrhythmical), cluster 3 (disorganized: arrhythmical + unable to sustain), and cluster 4 (disorganized: arrhythmical + incoordination ± unable to sustain) and further divided into incoordination-positive (cluster 4) and incoordination-negative groups (clusters 2 and 3). Premature infants in the incoordination-positive group (cluster 4, which means stress signals) showed a median transition time of 22 days (range: 4-121 days) which was longer than that in the incoordination-negative group (median 6 days; range: 1-25 days). Univariate linear regression analysis revealed that the presence of incoordination among disorganized sucking patterns (NOMAS cluster 4 vs. clusters 2 and 3), birth weight, total parenteral nutrition (TPN) duration, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation duration, the presence of moderate to severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia, pulmonary hypertension, sepsis, small for gestational age (SGA), and necrotizing enterocolitis are associated with the transition time to FOF. In a multivariate linear regression analysis, the variables revealed to be associated with the transition time were TPN duration, SGA, and the presence of stress signals (incoordination-positive group) among disorganized sucking patterns. When selecting premature infants to be treated with swallowing therapy, it is reasonable to pay more attention to the incoordination-positive group described in the NOMAS, that is, premature infants with stress signals to shorten the time to attain FOF.

Keywords: Neonatal Oral-Motor Assessment Scale; feeding behavior; feeding difficulty; incoordination; premature infant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flowchart. Of the 148 infants evaluated, time to full oral feeding was compared in 109 preterm infants with disorganized sucking patterns. aExcluded if assessment of the NOMAS was performed at >postmenstrual age 50 weeks or GA ≥ 37 weeks.b Excluded if the infant received postnatal surgery resulting in the interruption of oral feeding (n = 6) or the NOMAS assessment point was later than 72 h after oral feeding initiation (n = 12).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The transition time from the initiation of oral feeding (IOF) to full oral feeding (FOF) between the two groups; p < 0.001 by the Mann–Whitney U test.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Glass RP, Wolf LS. A global perspective on feeding assessment in the neonatal intensive care unit. Am J Occup Ther (1994) 48:514–26.10.5014/ajot.48.6.514 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bingham PM. Deprivation and dysphagia in premature infants. J Child Neurol (2009) 24:743–9.10.1177/0883073808329530 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lima AH, Côrtes MG, Bouzada MC, Friche AA. Preterm newborn readiness for oral feeding: systematic review and meta-analysis. Codas (2015) 1:101–7.10.1590/2317-1782/20152014104 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dodrill P, McMahon S, Donovan T, Cleghorn G. Current management of transitional feeding issues in preterm neonates born in Queensland, Australia. Early Hum Dev (2008) 84:637–43.10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2008.04.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Howe TH, Sheu CF, Hsieh YW, Hsieh CL. Psychometric characteristics of the Neonatal Oral-Motor Assessment Scale in healthy preterm infants. Dev Med Child Neurol (2007) 49:915–9.10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00915.x - DOI - PubMed