PARP inhibitors for homologous recombination-deficient prostate cancer
- PMID: 29595348
- PMCID: PMC6088797
- DOI: 10.1080/14728214.2018.1459563
PARP inhibitors for homologous recombination-deficient prostate cancer
Abstract
Prostate adenocarcinoma represents a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Increased emphasis on understanding the molecular basis of prostate cancer has identified a substantial burden of homologous recombination (HR) pathway mutations, which are enriched in castrate-resistant disease. This discovery has yielded novel therapeutic opportunities. Areas covered: We will discuss the treatment of castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), with a focus on the use of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in this space. Evidence for use in HR-deficient patients will be outlined with discussion of the mechanism of action for this drug class, pathways of resistance, and approaches for expanding PARP inhibitor use to non-HR-deficient prostate cancer subgroups. Expert opinion: PARP inhibition represents an exciting tool for management of HR-inactivated CRPC. With rapid adoption of next-generation sequencing technologies and other molecular techniques, the number of patients in this category is likely to increase. Ongoing and future investigations will be critical for improved understanding of the promise and appropriate treatment sequencing of PARP inhibition and optimal options for HR-proficient and -deficient prostate cancer populations. Questions remain about the clinical significance of monoallelic vs. biallelic HR mutations, the relevance of germline vs. somatic-only mutations, and the importance of mutations in non-canonical HR genes.
Keywords: DNA repair; PARP inhibitors; castrate resistant prostate carcinoma; homologous recombination deficiency; niraparib; olaparib; rucaparib.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interest
E S Antonarakis is a paid consultant/advisor to Janssen, Astellas, Sanofi, Dendreon, Medivation, ESSA, AstraZeneca, Clovis and Merck; he has received research funding to his institution from Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Sanofi, Dendreon, Genentech, Novartis, Tokai, Bristol Myers-Squibb, AstraZeneca, Clovis and Merck; and he is the co-inventor of a biomarker technology that has been licensed to Tokai and Qiagen. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed. Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose
References
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, and Jemal A, Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin, 2017. 67(1): p. 7–30. - PubMed
-
- Mateo J, et al., DNA Repair in Prostate Cancer: Biology and Clinical Implications. Eur Urol, 2017. 71(3): p. 417–425. - PubMed
-
- Castro E, et al., Effect of BRCA Mutations on Metastatic Relapse and Cause-specific Survival After Radical Treatment for Localised Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol, 2015. 68(2): p. 186–93. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources