Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 29;14(3):e1005994.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005994. eCollection 2018 Mar.

Eleven quick tips for architecting biomedical informatics workflows with cloud computing

Affiliations

Eleven quick tips for architecting biomedical informatics workflows with cloud computing

Brian S Cole et al. PLoS Comput Biol. .

Abstract

Cloud computing has revolutionized the development and operations of hardware and software across diverse technological arenas, yet academic biomedical research has lagged behind despite the numerous and weighty advantages that cloud computing offers. Biomedical researchers who embrace cloud computing can reap rewards in cost reduction, decreased development and maintenance workload, increased reproducibility, ease of sharing data and software, enhanced security, horizontal and vertical scalability, high availability, a thriving technology partner ecosystem, and much more. Despite these advantages that cloud-based workflows offer, the majority of scientific software developed in academia does not utilize cloud computing and must be migrated to the cloud by the user. In this article, we present 11 quick tips for architecting biomedical informatics workflows on compute clouds, distilling knowledge gained from experience developing, operating, maintaining, and distributing software and virtualized appliances on the world's largest cloud. Researchers who follow these tips stand to benefit immediately by migrating their workflows to cloud computing and embracing the paradigm of abstraction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Charlebois K, Palmour N, Knoppers BM. The Adoption of Cloud Computing in the Field of Genomics Research: The Influence of Ethical and Legal Issues. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2016;11(10):e0164347 Available from: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164347 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fusaro VA, Patil P, Gafni E, Wall DP, Tonellato PJ. Biomedical Cloud Computing With Amazon Web Services. Lewitter F, editor. PLoS Comput Biol [Internet]. 2011. August 25 [cited 2017 Jun 15];7(8):e1002147 Available from: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002147 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schadt EE, Linderman MD, Sorenson J, Lee L, Nolan GP. Cloud and heterogeneous computing solutions exist today for the emerging big data problems in biology. Nat Rev Genet [Internet]. 2011. March 8 [cited 2017 Jun 15];12(3):224–224. Available from: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nrg2857-c2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Muth T, Peters J, Blackburn J, Rapp E, Martens L. ProteoCloud: A full-featured open source proteomics cloud computing pipeline. J Proteomics [Internet]. 2013. August [cited 2017 Jun 15];88:104–8. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1874391913000134 doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.12.026 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grossman RL, White KP. A vision for a biomedical cloud. J Intern Med [Internet]. 2012. February [cited 2017 Jun 15];271(2):122–30. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02491.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources