Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul;26(7):972-983.
doi: 10.1038/s41431-017-0057-3. Epub 2018 Mar 30.

Psychological outcomes and surgical decisions after genetic testing in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer with and without a family history

Affiliations

Psychological outcomes and surgical decisions after genetic testing in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer with and without a family history

Bettina Meiser et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Jul.

Abstract

In patients with early breast cancer, personal and tumour characteristics other than family history are increasingly used to prompt genetic testing to guide women's cancer management (treatment-focused genetic testing, 'TFGT'). Women without a known strong family history of breast and/or ovarian may be more vulnerable to psychological sequelae arising from TFGT. We compared the impact of TFGT in women with (FH+) and without (FH-) a strong family history on psychological adjustment and surgical decisions. Women aged <50 years with high-risk features were offered TFGT before definitive breast cancer surgery and completed self-report questionnaires at four time points over 12 months. All 128 women opted for TFGT. TFGT identified 18 carriers of a disease-causing variant (50.0% FH+) and 110 non-carriers (59.1% FH+). There were no differences based on family history in bilateral mastectomy (BM) uptake, p = .190, or uptake of risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRBSO), p = .093. FH- women had lower decreases in anxiety a year after diagnosis, p = .011, and regret regarding their decision whether to undergo BM, p = .022, or RRBSO, p = .016 than FH + women. FH- carriers reported significantly higher regret regarding their TFGT choice (p = .024) and test-related distress (p = .012) than FH + carriers, but this regret/distress could not be attributed to a concern regarding a possible worse prognosis. These findings indicate that FH- women may require additional counselling to facilitate informed decisions. Carriers without a family history may require additional follow-up counselling to facilitate psychological adjustment to their positive variant results, extra support in making surgical decisions, and counselling about how best to communicate results to family members.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

BM, KT and MG have remunerated consultant roles with the company Astrazeneca with respect to unrelated projects. The remaining authors declare that they have no competing intersts.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Flow of participants through the study
RC research co-ordinator; T1 = baseline questionnaire; T2 = within 1 week of receiving education; T3 = 2 weeks post-disclosure of testing result; T4 = 12 months after study enrolment
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Time point simple effects for Impact of Event Scale scores
Note *p = .006, **p < .001
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Time point simple effects for Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores
Note *p < .01, **p < .001
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Time point simple effects for Test-Related Positive and Experiences and Distress scores
Note *p < .001

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Trainer A, Lewis C, Tucker K, Meiser B, Friedlander M, Ward R. Treatment-focused genetic assessment in breast cancer - the evolving role of the familial cancer services. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010;7:708–17. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.175. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Metcalfe K, Lynch H, Ghadirian P, et al. Risk of ipsilateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res Tr. 2011;127:287–96. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1336-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van den Broek A, van’t Veer L, Hooning M, et al. Impact of age at primary breast cancer on contralateral breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol. 2015;34:409–18. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.3942. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Metcalfe K, Gershman S, Ghadirian P, et al. Contralateral mastectomy and survival after breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: retrospective analysis. BMJ. 2014;348:226. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g226. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Evans D, Ingham S, Baildam A, et al. Contralateral mastectomy improves survival in women with BRCA1/2-associated breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;140:135–42. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2583-1. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms