Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 15:9:142.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00142. eCollection 2018.

A Tool to Quantify the Functional Impact of Oscillopsia

Eric R Anson  1   2 , Yoav Gimmon  1   3 , Tim Kiemel  4 , John J Jeka  5 , John P Carey  1
Affiliations

A Tool to Quantify the Functional Impact of Oscillopsia

Eric R Anson et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

Background: Individuals with bilateral vestibular hypofunction (BVH) often report symptoms of oscillopsia during walking. Existing assessments of oscillopsia are limited to descriptions of severity and symptom frequency, neither of which provides a description of functional limitations attributed to oscillopsia. A novel questionnaire, the Oscillopsia Functional Impact scale (OFI) was developed to describe the impact of oscillopsia on daily life activities. Questions on the OFI ask how often individuals are able to execute specific activities considered to depend on gaze stability in an effort to link functional mobility impairments to oscillopsia for individuals with vestibular loss.

Methods: Subjective reports of oscillopsia and balance confidence were recorded for 21 individuals with BVH and 48 healthy controls. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the relationship between the OFI and oscillopsia visual analog scale (OS VAS), oscillopsia severity questionnaire (OSQ), and Activities-Specific Balance Confidence scale to demonstrate face validity. Chronbach's α was calculated to determine internal validity for the items of the OFI. A one-way MANOVA was conducted with planned post hoc paired t-tests for group differences on all oscillopsia questionnaires using a corrected α = 0.0125.

Results: The OFI was highly correlated with measures of oscillopsia severity (OS VAS; r = 0.69, p < 0.001) and frequency (OSQ; r = 0.84, p < 0.001) and also with the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence scale (r = -0.84, p < 0.001). Cronbach's α for the OFI was 0.97. Individuals with BVH scored worse on all measures of oscillopsia and balance confidence compared to healthy individuals (p's < 0.001).

Conclusion: The OFI appears to capture the construct of oscillopsia in the context of functional mobility. Combining with oscillopsia metrics that quantify severity and frequency allows for a more complete characterization of the impact of oscillopsia on an individual's daily behavior. The OFI discriminated individuals with BVH from healthy individuals.

Keywords: activity and participation restriction; balance; mobility; oscillospia; vestibular loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Gibson JJ. Visually controlled locomotion and visual orientation in animals. Br J Psychol (1958) 49:182–94. 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1958.tb00656.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patla AE, Vickers JN. How far ahead do we look when required to step on specific locations in the travel path during locomotion? Exp Brain Res (2003) 148:133–8. 10.1007/s00221-002-1246-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grossman GE, Leigh RJ, Bruce EN, Huebner WP, Lanska DJ. Performance of the human vestibuloocular reflex during locomotion. J Neurophysiol (1989) 62:264–72. 10.1152/jn.1989.62.1.264 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leigh J. Relationships among oscillopsia, the vestibulo-ocular reflex, and nystagmus. In: Sharpe JA, Barber HO, editors. The Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex and Vertigo. New York: Raven Press; (1993). p. 249–56.
    1. Badaracco C, Labini FS, Meli A, Tufarelli D. Oscillopsia in labyrinthine defective patients: comparison of objective and subjective measures. Am J Otolaryngol (2010) 31:399–403. 10.1016/j.amjoto.2009.06.002 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources