Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 26;4(2):e230.
doi: 10.1212/NXG.0000000000000230. eCollection 2018 Apr.

Diagnostic odyssey of patients with mitochondrial disease: Results of a survey

Affiliations

Diagnostic odyssey of patients with mitochondrial disease: Results of a survey

Johnston Grier et al. Neurol Genet. .

Abstract

Objective: To document the complex "diagnostic odyssey" of patients with mitochondrial disease.

Methods: We analyzed data from 210 Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network Contact Registry participants who were patients with a biochemical deficiency or self-reported diagnosis of mitochondrial disease, or their caregivers.

Results: Participants saw an average of 8.19 clinicians (SD 8.0, median 5). The first clinician consulted about symptoms was typically a primary care physician (56.7%), although 35.2% of participants initially sought a specialist. Of note, 55.2% of participants received their diagnosis from a neurologist, 18.2% from a clinical geneticist, and 11.8% from a metabolic disease specialist. A majority of the participants (54.6%) received 1 or more nonmitochondrial diagnoses before their final mitochondrial diagnosis. In their pursuit of a diagnosis, 84.8% of participants received blood tests, 71% a muscle biopsy, 60.5% MRI, and 38.6% urine organic acids. In addition, 39.5% of the participants underwent mitochondrial DNA sequencing, 19% sequencing of nuclear gene(s), and 11.4% whole-exome sequencing.

Conclusions: The diagnostic odyssey of patients with mitochondrial disease is complex and burdensome. It features multiple consultations and tests, and, often, conflicting diagnoses. These reflect disease variety, diagnostic uncertainty, and clinician unfamiliarity. The current survey provides an important benchmark. Its replication at appropriate intervals will assist in tracking changes that may accompany increased popularity of exome testing, more rigorous diagnostic criteria, increased patient reported outcome activity, and trials for promising therapies.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Gorman G, Schaefer A, Ng Y, et al. Prevalence of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA mutations related to adult mitochondrial disease. Ann Neurol 2015;77:753–759. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gorman G, Chinnery P, DiMauro S, et al. Mitochondrial diseases. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2016;2:16080. - PubMed
    1. Parikh S, Goldstein A, Koenig MK, et al. Diagnosis and management of mitochondrial disease: a consensus statement from the Mitochondrial Medicine Society. Genet Med 2015;17:689–701. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dare JT, Vasta V, Penn J, Tran NT, Hahn SH. Targeted exome sequencing for mitochondrial disorders reveals high genetic heterogeneity. BMC Med Genet 2013;14:118. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martikainen MH, Chinnery PF. Mitochondrial disease: mimics and chameleons. Pract Neurol 2015;15:424–435. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources