Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2018 Apr;15(4):238-239.
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4541. Epub 2018 Mar 30.

Response to "Unexpected mutations after CRISPR-Cas9 editing in vivo"

Affiliations
Comment

Response to "Unexpected mutations after CRISPR-Cas9 editing in vivo"

Caleb A Lareau et al. Nat Methods. 2018 Apr.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement

J.K.J. has financial interests in Beam Therapeutics, Editas Medicine, Monitor Biotechnologies, Pairwise Plants, Poseida Therapeutics, and Transposagen Biopharmaceuticals. M.J.A. has financial interests in Monitor Biotechnologies. J.K.J.’s and M.J.A.’s interests were reviewed and are managed by Massachusetts General Hospital and Partners HealthCare in accordance with their conflict of interest policies.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Measures of genetic relatedness in the F03, F05 and FVB mice.
(a) Isogenic model of 3 mice with no private mutations within or shared between mice. (b) observed dbSNP in F03 and F05 mice (n = 31,079). (c) an isogenic system assumes the number of loci with shared genotypes is nearly identical for all mice (d) the observed data demonstrates a clear departure from this equal genetic model at common variants and other non-dbSNP loci (n = 38,981). The variants previously reported by Schaefer et al. (dark gray) represent only a small subset of the genotypes common to F03 and F05 but distinct from FVB at non-dbSNP sites. The observed ratios in B and D cannot be distinguished from each other (p = 0.304; two-sided Fisher’s Exact Test), but each represent a significant departure (p < 2.2 × 10−16; Chi-Squared Test) from the equal genetic distance model (C) required to attribute differential SNVs to Cas9 activity.

Comment on

References

    1. Schaefer KA et al. Unexpected mutations after CRISPR-Cas9 editing in vivo. Nat Methods 14, 547–548 (2017). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pattanayak V et al. High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity. Nat Biotechnol 31, 839–843 (2013). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Veres A et al. Low incidence of off-target mutations in individual CRISPR-Cas9 and TALEN targeted human stem cell clones detected by whole-genome sequencing. Cell Stem Cell 15, 27–30 (2014). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim D et al. Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells. Nat Methods 12, 237–243, 231 p following 243 (2015). - PubMed
    1. Iyer V et al. Off-target mutations are rare in Cas9-modified mice. Nat Methods 12, 479 (2015). - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources