Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Sep;125(9):1444-1451.
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.02.020. Epub 2018 Mar 27.

Successful Optimization of Adalimumab Therapy in Refractory Uveitis Due to Behçet's Disease

Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Successful Optimization of Adalimumab Therapy in Refractory Uveitis Due to Behçet's Disease

José Luis Martín-Varillas et al. Ophthalmology. 2018 Sep.
Free article

Erratum in

  • Corrigendum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Ophthalmology. 2019 Jan;126(1):177. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.10.039. Ophthalmology. 2019. PMID: 30577914 No abstract available.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of adalimumab (ADA) therapy optimization in a large series of patients with uveitis due to Behçet disease (BD) who achieved remission after the use of this biologic agent.

Design: Open-label multicenter study of ADA-treated patients with BD uveitis refractory to conventional immunosuppressants.

Subjects: Sixty-five of 74 patients with uveitis due to BD, who achieved remission after a median ADA duration of 6 (range, 3-12) months. ADA was optimized in 23 (35.4%) of them. This biologic agent was maintained at a dose of 40 mg/subcutaneously/2 weeks in the remaining 42 patients.

Methods: After remission, based on a shared decision between the patient and the treating physician, ADA was optimized. When agreement between patient and physician was reached, optimization was performed by prolonging the ADA dosing interval progressively. Comparison between optimized and nonoptimized patients was performed.

Main outcome measures: Efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness in optimized and nonoptimized groups. To determine efficacy, intraocular inflammation (anterior chamber cells, vitritis, and retinal vasculitis), macular thickness, visual acuity, and the sparing effect of glucocorticoids were assessed.

Results: No demographic or ocular differences were found at the time of ADA onset between the optimized and the nonoptimized groups. Most ocular outcomes were similar after a mean ± standard deviation follow-up of 34.7±13.3 and 26±21.3 months in the optimized and nonoptimized groups, respectively. However, relevant adverse effects were only seen in the nonoptimized group (lymphoma, pneumonia, severe local reaction at the injection site, and bacteremia by Escherichia coli, 1 each). Moreover, the mean ADA treatment costs were lower in the optimized group than in the nonoptimized group (6101.25 euros/patient/year vs. 12 339.48; P < 0.01).

Conclusion: ADA optimization in BD uveitis refractory to conventional therapy is effective, safe, and cost-effective.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types