Effect of age and hearing loss on auditory stream segregation of speech sounds
- PMID: 29602593
- PMCID: PMC5984159
- DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.03.017
Effect of age and hearing loss on auditory stream segregation of speech sounds
Abstract
Segregating and understanding speech in complex environments is a major challenge for hearing-impaired (HI) listeners. It remains unclear to what extent these difficulties are dominated by direct interference, such as simultaneous masking, or by a failure of the mechanisms of stream segregation. This study compared older HI listeners' performance with that of young and older normal-hearing (NH) listeners in stream segregation tasks involving speech sounds. Listeners were presented with sequences of speech tokens, each consisting of a fricative consonant and a voiced vowel (CV). The CV tokens were concatenated into interleaved sequences that alternated in fundamental frequency (F0) and/or simulated vocal tract length (VTL). Each pair of interleaved sequences was preceded by a "word" consisting of two random tokens. The listeners were asked to indicate whether the word was present in the following interleaved sequences. The word, if present, occurred within one of the interleaved sequences, so that performance improved if the listeners were able to perceptually segregate the two sequences. Although HI listeners' identification of the speech tokens in isolation was poorer than that of the NH listeners, HI listeners were generally able to use both F0 and VTL cues to segregate the interleaved sequences. The results suggest that the difficulties experienced by HI listeners in complex acoustic environments cannot be explained by a loss of basic stream segregation abilities.
Keywords: Auditory stream segregation; Fundamental frequency; Hearing loss; Vocal tract length.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Sequential stream segregation of voiced and unvoiced speech sounds based on fundamental frequency.Hear Res. 2017 Feb;344:235-243. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.11.016. Epub 2016 Dec 5. Hear Res. 2017. PMID: 27923739 Free PMC article.
-
The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Sep;132(3):1667-78. doi: 10.1121/1.4739463. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012. PMID: 22978895 Free PMC article.
-
Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jun;137(6):3487-501. doi: 10.1121/1.4921603. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015. PMID: 26093436 Free PMC article.
-
Pitch perception and auditory stream segregation: implications for hearing loss and cochlear implants.Trends Amplif. 2008 Dec;12(4):316-31. doi: 10.1177/1084713808325881. Epub 2008 Oct 30. Trends Amplif. 2008. PMID: 18974203 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Problems hearing in noise in older adults: a review of spatial processing disorder.Trends Amplif. 2011 Sep;15(3):116-26. doi: 10.1177/1084713811424885. Epub 2011 Nov 8. Trends Amplif. 2011. PMID: 22072599 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Salience-Dependent Disruption of Sustained Auditory Attention Can Be Inferred from Evoked Pupil Responses and Neural Tracking of Task-Irrelevant Sounds.J Neurosci. 2025 Apr 2;45(14):e2066232025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2066-23.2025. J Neurosci. 2025. PMID: 39904628
-
Does social isolation mediate the association between hearing loss and cognition in adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 16;12:1347794. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1347794. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38292910 Free PMC article.
-
Temporal coherence effects on voice attribution in multi-speaker stream segregation.JASA Express Lett. 2025 May 1;5(5):054401. doi: 10.1121/10.0036672. JASA Express Lett. 2025. PMID: 40338794 Free PMC article.
-
Can You Hear Out the Melody? Testing Musical Scene Perception in Young Normal-Hearing and Older Hearing-Impaired Listeners.Trends Hear. 2020 Jan-Dec;24:2331216520945826. doi: 10.1177/2331216520945826. Trends Hear. 2020. PMID: 32895034 Free PMC article.
-
No interaction between fundamental-frequency differences and spectral region when perceiving speech in a speech background.PLoS One. 2021 Apr 7;16(4):e0249654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249654. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33826663 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Arehart KH, King CA, McLean-Mudgett KS. Role of Fundamental Frequency Differences in the Perceptual Separation of Competing Vowel Sounds by Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss. J. Speech Lang. Hear Res. 1997;40(6):1434–1444. - PubMed
-
- Bird J, Darwin CJ. Effects of a difference in fundamental frequency in separating two sentences. In: Palmer AR, Rees A, Summerfield Q, Meddis R, editors. Psychophysical and Physiological Advances in Hearing. London: Whurr, London; 1998. pp. 263–269.
-
- Boersma P, Weenink D. “Praat a system for doing phonetics by computer,” [Computer program]. Version 6.0.31. 2017 Last Retreived 21 August 2017 Form http://www.praat.org/
-
- Bregman AS. Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sounds. MIT Press; Cambridge: 1990.
-
- Brokx JP, Nooteboom SG. Intonation and the perceptual separation of simultaneous voices. J. Phon. 1982;10(1):23–36.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical