Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep;22(9):3009-3023.
doi: 10.1007/s10461-018-2103-8.

Identifying Spatial Variation Along the HIV Care Continuum: The Role of Distance to Care on Retention and Viral Suppression

Affiliations

Identifying Spatial Variation Along the HIV Care Continuum: The Role of Distance to Care on Retention and Viral Suppression

A S Terzian et al. AIDS Behav. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

Distance to HIV care may be associated with retention in care (RIC) and viral suppression (VS). RIC (≥ 2 HIV visits or labs ≥ 90 days apart in 12 months), prescribed antiretroviral therapy (ART), VS (< 200 copies/mL at last visit) and distance to care were estimated among 3623 DC Cohort participants receiving HIV care in 13 outpatient clinics in Washington, DC in 2015. Logistic regression models and geospatial statistics were computed. RIC was 73%; 97% were on ART, among whom 77% had VS. ZIP code-level clusters of low RIC and high VS were found in Northwest DC, and low VS in Southeast DC. Those traveling ≥ 5 miles had 30% lower RIC (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.71, 95% CI 0.58, 0.86) and lower VS (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52, 0.94). Geospatial clustering of RIC and VS was observed, and distance may be a barrier to optimal HIV care outcomes.

Keywords: Care continuum; Distance; Retention; Spatial patterns; Viral suppression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Geography, density, distance to care to HIV care, retention-in-care (RIC) and viral suppression (VS) by ZIP code of residence in Washington, DC 2014-2015
A, % participants residing in ZIP codes with areas in darker blue representing ZIP codes with higher percentages. Red circles and yellow triangles represent DC Cohort community-based and hospital-based clinics, respectively. B, Median distance to care site with areas in darker blue representing ZIP codes with participants travelling longer distances to care. C, RIC % (Quartiles) with areas in darker blue representing ZIP codes with higher RIC. D, VS% (Quartiles) with areas in darker blue representing ZIP codes with higher VS.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Hot spot analysis of retention-in-care (RIC) and viral suppression (VS) in Washington, DC 2014-2015
A, RIC. B, VS.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shacham E, Estlund AL, Tanner AE, et al. Challenges to HIV management among youth engaged in HIV care. AIDS Care. 2017. February;29(2):189–196. - PubMed
    1. Dailey AF, Johnson AS, Wu B. HIV Care Outcomes Among Blacks with Diagnosed HIV - United States, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017. February 3;66(4):97–103. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6604a2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Castel AD, Kalmin M, Hart R, et al. Disparities in achieving and sustaining viral suppression among a large cohort of HIV-infected persons in care - Washington, DC. AIDS Care. 2016. DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1189496 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wolitski RJ, Kidder DP, Pals SL, et al.; Housing and Health Study Team. Randomized trial of the effects of housing assistance on the health and risk behaviors of homeless and unstably housed people living with HIV. AIDS Behav. 2010;14(3):493–503. doi: 10.1007/s10461-009-9643-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ransome Y, Kawachi I, Braunstein S, et al. Structural inequalities drive late HIV diagnosis: The role of black racial concentration, income inequality, socioeconomic deprivation, and HIV testing. Health Place. 2016; 42:148–158. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.09.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources