Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Jun;24(6):779-789.
doi: 10.1002/lt.25068. Epub 2018 May 14.

Expanding the donor pool: Donation after circulatory death and living liver donation do not compromise the results of liver transplantation

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Expanding the donor pool: Donation after circulatory death and living liver donation do not compromise the results of liver transplantation

Dagmar Kollmann et al. Liver Transpl. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

Because of the shortfall between the number of patients listed for liver transplantation (LT) and the available grafts, strategies to expand the donor pool have been developed. Donation after circulatory death (DCD) and living donor (LD) grafts are not universally used because of the concerns of graft failure, biliary complications, and donor risks. In order to overcome the barriers for the implementation of using all 3 types of grafts, we compared outcomes after LT of DCD, LD, and donation after brain death (DBD) grafts. Patients who received a LD, DCD, or DBD liver graft at the University of Toronto were included. Between January 2009 through April 2017, 1054 patients received a LT at our center. Of these, 77 patients received a DCD graft (DCD group); 271 received a LD graft (LD group); and 706 received a DBD graft (DBD group). Overall biliary complications were higher in the LD group (11.8%) compared with the DCD group (5.2%) and the DBD group (4.8%; P < 0.001). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates were similar between the groups with 88.3%, 83.2%, and 69.2% in the DCD group versus 92.6%, 85.4%, and 84.7% in the LD group versus 90.2%, 84.2%, and 79.9% in the DBD group (P = 0.24). Furthermore, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival was comparable, with 92.2%, 85.4%, and 71.6% in the DCD group versus 95.2%, 88.8%, and 88.8% in the LD group versus 93.1%, 87.5%, and 83% in the DBD group (P = 0.14). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the type of graft did not impact graft survival. In conclusion, DCD, LD, and DBD grafts have similar longterm graft survival rates. Increasing the use of LD and DCD grafts may improve access to LT without affecting graft survival rates. Liver Transplantation 24 779-789 2018 AASLD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graft survival rates as analyzed by Kaplan‐Meier estimation and compared between recipients who have received a DCD graft (black line) versus a LD graft (gray line) versus a DBD graft (black dotted line). Patients at risk are shown in the table below the graph.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient survival rates have been analyzed by Kaplan‐Meier estimation and compared between recipients who have received a DCD graft (black line) versus a LD graft (gray line) versus a DBD graft (black dotted line). Patients at risk are shown in the table below the graph.

References

    1. Kim WR, Stock PG, Smith JM, Heimbach JK, Skeans MA, Edwards EB, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2011 annual data report: liver. Am J Transplant 2013;1(suppl):73‐102. - PubMed
    1. United Network for Organ Sharing . OPTN Organ Recovery and Transplantation Network Transplants by Organ 1988‐2014 http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov. Accessed November 2017.
    1. Northup PG, Intagliata NM, Shah NL, Pelletier SJ, Berg CL, Argo CK. Excess mortality on the liver transplant waiting list: unintended policy consequences and Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease (MELD) inflation. Hepatology 2015;61:285‐291. - PubMed
    1. Tanaka K, Uemoto S, Tokunaga Y, Fujita S, Sano K, Nishizawa T, et al. Surgical techniques and innovations in living related liver transplantation. Ann Surg 1993;217:82‐91. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mathur AK, Heimbach J, Steffick DE, Sonnenday CJ, Goodrich NP, Merion RM, et al. Donation after cardiac death liver transplantation: predictors of outcome. Am J Transplant 2010;10:2512‐2519. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms