A Postgenomic Perspective on Molecular Cytogenetics
- PMID: 29606910
- PMCID: PMC5850511
- DOI: 10.2174/1389202918666170717145716
A Postgenomic Perspective on Molecular Cytogenetics
Abstract
Background: The postgenomic era is featured by massive data collection and analyses from various large scale-omics studies. Despite the promising capability of systems biology and bioinformatics to handle large data sets, data interpretation, especially the translation of -omics data into clinical implications, has been challenging.
Discussion: In this perspective, some important conceptual and technological limitations of current systems biology are discussed in the context of the ultimate importance of the genome beyond the collection of all genes. Following a brief summary of the contributions of molecular cytogenetics/cytogenomics in the pre- and post-genomic eras, new challenges for postgenomic research are discussed. Such discussion leads to a call to search for a new conceptual framework and holistic methodologies.
Conclusion: Throughout this synthesis, the genome theory of somatic cell evolution is highlighted in contrast to gene theory, which ignores the karyotype-mediated higher level of genetic information. Since "system inheritance" is defined by the genome context (gene content and genomic topology) while "parts inheritance" is defined by genes/epigenes, molecular cytogenetics and cytogenomics (which directly study genome structure, function, alteration and evolution) will play important roles in this postgenomic era.
Keywords: Fuzzy inheritance; Genome chaos; Genome re-organization; Genome theory; Heterogeneity; Karyotype coding; Parts inheritance; System inheritance; Systems biology.
Similar articles
-
Challenges and Opportunities for Clinical Cytogenetics in the 21st Century.Genes (Basel). 2023 Feb 15;14(2):493. doi: 10.3390/genes14020493. Genes (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36833419 Free PMC article.
-
The New Era of Cancer Cytogenetics and Cytogenomics.Methods Mol Biol. 2024;2825:3-37. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3946-7_1. Methods Mol Biol. 2024. PMID: 38913301
-
What Is Karyotype Coding and Why Is Genomic Topology Important for Cancer and Evolution?Front Genet. 2019 Nov 1;10:1082. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01082. eCollection 2019. Front Genet. 2019. PMID: 31737054 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Genome chaos: Creating new genomic information essential for cancer macroevolution.Semin Cancer Biol. 2022 Jun;81:160-175. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.11.003. Epub 2020 Nov 13. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022. PMID: 33189848 Review.
-
Optical Genome Mapping: A Machine-Based Platform in Cytogenomics.Methods Mol Biol. 2024;2825:113-124. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3946-7_5. Methods Mol Biol. 2024. PMID: 38913305
Cited by
-
The variome concept: focus on CNVariome.Mol Cytogenet. 2019 Dec 19;12:52. doi: 10.1186/s13039-019-0467-8. eCollection 2019. Mol Cytogenet. 2019. PMID: 31890032 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges and Opportunities for Clinical Cytogenetics in the 21st Century.Genes (Basel). 2023 Feb 15;14(2):493. doi: 10.3390/genes14020493. Genes (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36833419 Free PMC article.
-
The New Era of Cancer Cytogenetics and Cytogenomics.Methods Mol Biol. 2024;2825:3-37. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3946-7_1. Methods Mol Biol. 2024. PMID: 38913301
-
The Importance of Monitoring Non-clonal Chromosome Aberrations (NCCAs) in Cancer Research.Methods Mol Biol. 2024;2825:79-111. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3946-7_4. Methods Mol Biol. 2024. PMID: 38913304
-
Pathway-based classification of genetic diseases.Mol Cytogenet. 2019 Feb 4;12:4. doi: 10.1186/s13039-019-0418-4. eCollection 2019. Mol Cytogenet. 2019. PMID: 30766616 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Venter J.C., Adams M.D., Myers E.W., Li P.W., Mural R.J., Sutton G.G., Smith H.O., Yandell M., Evans C.A., Holt R.A., Gocayne J.D., Amanatides P., Ballew R.M., Huson D.H., Wortman J.R., Zhang Q., Kodira C.D., Zheng X.H., Chen L., Skupski M., Subramanian G., Thomas P.D., Zhang J., Miklos G.L., Nelson C., Broder S., Clark A.G., Nadeau J., McKusick V.A., Zinder N., Levine A.J., Roberts R.J., Simon M., Slayman C., Hunkapiller M., Bolanos R., Delcher A., Dew I., Fasulo D., Flanigan M., Florea L., Halpern A., Hannenhalli S., Kravitz S., Levy S., Mobarry C., Reinert K., Remington K., Abu-Threideh J., Beasley E., Biddick K., Bonazzi V., Brandon R., Cargill M., Chandramouliswaran I., Charlab R., Chaturvedi K., Deng Z., Di Francesco V., Dunn P., Eilbeck K., Evangelista C., Gabrielian A.E., Gan W., Ge W., Gong F., Gu Z., Guan P., Heiman T.J., Higgins M.E., Ji R.R., Ke Z., Ketchum K.A., Lai Z., Lei Y., Li Z., Li J., Liang Y., Lin X., Lu F., Merkulov G.V., Milshina N., Moore H.M., Naik A.K., Narayan V.A., Neelam B., Nusskern D., Rusch D.B., Salzberg S., Shao W., Shue B., Sun J., Wang Z., Wang A., Wang X., Wang J., Wei M., Wides R., Xiao C., Yan C., Yao A., Ye J., Zhan M., Zhang W., Zhang H., Zhao Q., Zheng L., Zhong F., Zhong W., Zhu S., Zhao S., Gilbert D., Baumhueter S., Spier G., Carter C., Cravchik A., Woodage T., Ali F., An H., Awe A., Baldwin D., Baden H., Barnstead M., Barrow I., Beeson K., Busam D., Carver A., Center A., Cheng M.L., Curry L., Danaher S., Davenport L., Desilets R., Dietz S., Dodson K., Doup L., Ferriera S., Garg N., Gluecksmann A., Hart B., Haynes J., Haynes C., Heiner C., Hladun S., Hostin D., Houck J., Howland T., Ibegwam C., Johnson J., Kalush F., Kline L., Koduru S., Love A., Mann F., May D., McCawley S., McIntosh T., McMullen I., Moy M., Moy L., Murphy B., Nelson K., Pfannkoch C., Pratts E., Puri V., Qureshi H., Reardon M., Rodriguez R., Rogers Y.H., Romblad D., Ruhfel B., Scott R., Sitter C., Smallwood M., Stewart E., Strong R., Suh E., Thomas R., Tint N.N., Tse S., Vech C., Wang G., Wetter J., Williams S., Williams M., Windsor S., Winn-Deen E., Wolfe K., Zaveri J., Zaveri K., Abril J.F., Guigó R., Campbell M.J., Sjolander K.V., Karlak B., Kejariwal A., Mi H., Lazareva B., Hatton T., Narechania A., Diemer K., Muruganujan A., Guo N., Sato S., Bafna V., Istrail S., Lippert R., Schwartz R., Walenz B., Yooseph S., Allen D., Basu A., Baxendale J., Blick L., Caminha M., Carnes-Stine J., Caulk P., Chiang Y.H., Coyne M., Dahlke C., Mays A., Dombroski M., Donnelly M., Ely D., Esparham S., Fosler C., Gire H., Glanowski S., Glasser K., Glodek A., Gorokhov M., Graham K., Gropman B., Harris M., Heil J., Henderson S., Hoover J., Jennings D., Jordan C., Jordan J., Kasha J., Kagan L., Kraft C., Levitsky A., Lewis M., Liu X., Lopez J., Ma D., Majoros W., McDaniel J., Murphy S., Newman M., Nguyen T., Nguyen N., Nodell M., Pan S., Peck J., Peterson M., Rowe W., Sanders R., Scott J., Simpson M., Smith T., Sprague A., Stockwell T., Turner R., Venter E., Wang M., Wen M., Wu D., Wu M., Xia A., Zandieh A., Zhu X. The sequence of the human genome. Science. 2001;291(5507):1304–1351. clinchem.aaccjnls.org/content/61/ 9/1207 - PubMed
-
- Heng H.H. The genome-centric concept: Resynthesis of evolutionary theory. BioEssays. 2009;31(5):512–525. - PubMed
-
- Heng H.H., Liu G., Stevens J.B., Bremer S.W., Ye K.J., Abdallah B.Y., Horne S.D., Ye C.J. Decoding the genome beyond sequencing: The new phase of genomic research. Genomics. 2011;98(4):242–252. - PubMed
-
- Heng H.H. Debating Cancer: The Paradox in Cancer Research. New Jersey, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing; 2015.
-
- Ideker T., Galitski T., Hood L. A new approach to decoding life: Systems biology. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 2001;2:343–372. http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/ 10.1146/annurev.genom.2.1.343 - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous