Eyesight: a study of the staff of a dental school
- PMID: 29607079
- PMCID: PMC5842860
- DOI: 10.1038/bdjopen.2017.8
Eyesight: a study of the staff of a dental school
Abstract
Objectives/aims: The aim was to investigate the vision of all 90 dentally qualified staff at a dental school.
Materials and methods: Ethical approval was obtained and a questionnaire-based survey conducted. Data were screened and analysed using Stata 13.1. The χ2 and Fisher's Exact tests were used to test for significance with an alpha level of 0.05.
Results: The participation rate was 95.6%. Most of the teachers (92%) considered their eyesight was satisfactory to practice dentistry. Of the 97% who had been tested at some stage, 15% had their eye examination due to sight deterioration with 22% needing correction. Almost two-thirds were myopic and a third were hyperopic. Forty-nine per cent wore spectacles only, with about a quarter of this group alternating between spectacles and contact lenses. Of those with corrected vision, 80% followed their optometrist's recall advice. Four participants reported that they were colour blind. While 4% had had laser-eye surgery, a further 27% were interested in this. Magnification was used by 72% with no significant differences between genders, age of staff member, place of qualification or registration status. Most of the staff (81%) thought that screening of dental student's eyesight should be mandatory, and regular eye examinations as a condition of dental practice was supported by 67%.
Discussion: The number of teachers reporting recent vision tests was encouraging; nevertheless, a worrying 8% surveyed were unsure if their eyesight was satisfactory for work. The commonest vision problem was myopia, with almost half of the teachers wearing spectacles. It is clear that visual standards for dentistry would be helpful. Magnification use was high, with many non-users indicating their intention to buy loupes.
Conclusions: Within the limits of this study the teachers were conscientious regarding their eye care, irrespective of their training and age. There was strong support for the mandatory testing of vision for all dentists and especially dental students.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Interventions to slow progression of myopia in children.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 13;1(1):CD004916. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004916.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 31930781 Free PMC article.
-
Spectacle and contact lens wearing six years after radial keratotomy in the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy Study.Ophthalmology. 1994 Mar;101(3):421-31. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31315-7. Ophthalmology. 1994. PMID: 8127562 Clinical Trial.
-
Magnification loupes in dentistry: A qualitative study of dental students' perspectives.Eur J Dent Educ. 2021 May;25(2):305-309. doi: 10.1111/eje.12605. Epub 2020 Oct 11. Eur J Dent Educ. 2021. PMID: 32976674
-
Magnification in dental practice and education: experience and attitudes of a dental school faculty.J Dent Educ. 2008 Jun;72(6):698-706. J Dent Educ. 2008. PMID: 18519600
-
Dental Magnification Loupes: An Update of the Evidence.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Mar 1;22(3):310-315. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021. PMID: 34210934 Review.
Cited by
-
Frequency of Color Vision Deficiency among Saudi Dental Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.Eur J Dent. 2021 Feb;15(1):27-32. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714766. Epub 2020 Sep 8. Eur J Dent. 2021. PMID: 32898867 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Murray CM, Gray AR, Chandler NP. Eyesight: a study of dental surgery students during their clinical training. Optom Pract 2016; 17: 113–120.
-
- Eichenberger M, Perrin P, Neuhaus KW, Bringolf U, Lussi A. Influence of loupes and age on the near visual acuity of practicing dentists. J Biomed Opt 2011; 16: 035003. - PubMed
-
- Laitinen A, Koskinen S, Härkänen T, Reunanen A, Laatikainen L, Aromaa A. A nationwide population-based survey on visual acuity, near vision, and self-reported visual function in the adult population in Finland. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 2227–2237. - PubMed
-
- Pan C-W, Ramamurthy D, Saw S-M. Worldwide prevalence and risk factors for myopia. Ophth Physiol Opt 2011; 32: 3–16. - PubMed
-
- Angle J, Wissman DA. The epidemiology of myopia. Am J Epidemiol 1980; 111: 220–228. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources