Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Sep 28;67(8):1191-1197.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy254.

Long-term Impact of Oral Azithromycin Taken by Gambian Women During Labor on Prevalence and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus in Their Infants: Follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Long-term Impact of Oral Azithromycin Taken by Gambian Women During Labor on Prevalence and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus in Their Infants: Follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Abdoulie Bojang et al. Clin Infect Dis. .

Erratum in

  • Erratum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Sep 14;67(7):1150. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy428. Clin Infect Dis. 2018. PMID: 30124782 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Background: Oral azithromycin given to women in labor decreases maternal and neonatal bacterial carriage but increases azithromycin-resistant bacteria during at least 4 weeks following the intervention. We assessed the prevalence of bacterial carriage and azithromycin resistance 12 months after treatment among study infants.

Methods: Nasopharyngeal swabs (NPSs) were collected between November 2014 and May 2015 from children aged 11-13 months whose mothers had received azithromycin or placebo during labor. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus were isolated using conventional microbiological methods. Antibiotic susceptibility was determined by disk diffusion and confirmed by Etest or VITEK-2.

Results: NPSs were collected from 461 children. The prevalence of S. pneumoniae and S. aureus was similar between children from the azithromycin and placebo arms (85.0% vs 82.1%; odds ratio [OR], 1.23 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .73-2.08] for S. pneumoniae and 21.7% vs 21.3%; OR, 1.02 [95% CI, .64-1.64] for S. aureus). Prevalence of azithromycin-resistant S. pneumoniae was similar in both arms (1.8% vs 0.9% in children from the azithromycin and placebo arms, respectively; OR, 2.10 [95% CI, .30-23.38]); resistance to other antibiotics was also similar between arms. For S. aureus, there was no difference in azithromycin resistance between children in the azithromycin (3.1%) and placebo (2.6%) arms (OR, 1.22 [95% CI, .35-4.47]) or resistance to any other antibiotics.

Conclusions: The higher prevalence of S. aureus azithromycin resistance observed among women treated during labor and their babies 4 weeks after treatment had waned 12 months after delivery. Azithromycin intervention did not induce other antibiotic resistance to S. pneumoniae or S. aureus.

Clinical trials registration: NCT01800942.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Heat map showing pattern of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates resistant (R) to at least 1 antibiotic (except cotrimoxazole), by arm. Resistance Etest cutoff values: azithromycin, ≥2 μg/mL; penicillin, ≥8 μg/mL; chloramphenicol, ≥8 μg/mL; erythromycin, ≥1 μg/mL; and clindamycin, ≥1 μg/mL. *Cotrimoxazole susceptibility patterns for isolates resistant to at least 1 of azithromycin, penicillin, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, and clindamycin are included in the table. Resistance cutoff value was ≤18 mm using disk diffusion.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Heat map showing pattern of Staphylococcus aureus isolates resistant (R) to at least 1 antibiotic, by arm. Resistance Etest cutoff values: azithromycin, ≥8 μg/mL; chloramphenicol, ≥32 μg/mL; erythromycin, ≥16 μg/mL; clindamycin, ≥4 μg/mL; cefoxitin for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), ≥8. Intermediate Etest cutoff values: azithromycin, 4 μg/mL; erythromycin, 1–4 μg/mL.

References

    1. Parnham MJ, Erakovic Haber V, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Perletti G, Verleden GM, Vos R. Azithromycin: mechanisms of action and their relevance for clinical applications. Pharmacol Ther 2014; 143:225–45. - PubMed
    1. Bignell C, Garley J. Azithromycin in the treatment of infection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Sex Transm Infect 2010; 86:422–6. - PubMed
    1. Harding-Esch EM, Sillah A, Edwards T et al. ; Partnership for Rapid Elimination of Trachoma (PRET) Study Group Mass treatment with azithromycin for trachoma: when is one round enough? Results from the PRET Trial in the Gambia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2013; 7:e2115. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yohannan J, Munoz B, Mkocha H et al. . Can we stop mass drug administration prior to 3 annual rounds in communities with low prevalence of trachoma? PRET Ziada trial results. JAMA Ophthalmol 2013; 131:431–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gebre T, Ayele B, Zerihun M et al. . Comparison of annual versus twice-yearly mass azithromycin treatment for hyperendemic trachoma in Ethiopia: a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet 2012; 379:143–51. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data