Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan;34(1):99-107.
doi: 10.3904/kjim.2017.251. Epub 2018 Apr 4.

Experiences of magnetic resonance imaging scanning in patients with pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

Donghoon Han  1 , Si-Hyuck Kang  1 , Youngjin Cho  1 , Il-Young Oh  1
Affiliations

Experiences of magnetic resonance imaging scanning in patients with pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

Donghoon Han et al. Korean J Intern Med. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Background/aims: Despite the U.S. Food and Drug Adminstration approving a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-conditional pacemaker system in 2011, many physicians remain reluctant to perform MRI scanning in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the real-world safety of MRI in these patients.

Methods: This single-center retrospective study examined the interrogation data and outcomes of patients with pacemakers or implantable cardioverter defibrillators who underwent MRI. MRI interrogation data were collected pre- and post-MRI and after 1 month of follow-up; these included the lead impedance, measured P- and R-wave amplitudes, and capture threshold. We compared these results between the magnetic resonance (MR)-conditional and conventional groups.

Results: From September 2013 to December 2015, 35 patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices underwent 43 MRI scans, with a mean follow-up of 5 months. Among these 35 patients, 14 (40%) had MR-conditional devices and 21 (60%) had conventional devices. Seven patients had high voltage devices, which were all the conventional type. There were no adverse events associated with MRI during the follow-up period, and there were no significant differences in the interrogation data changes between the conventional and MR-conditional groups.

Conclusion: This single-center retrospective study found that MRI can be performed safely in patients with pacemakers or implantable cardioverter defibrillators, regardless of the MRI support, as long as appropriate precautions are taken.

Keywords: Defibrillators, implantable; Interrogation data; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pacemakers; Safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Changes in the (A, B) atrial and ventricular impedance, (C, D) lead sensing, and (E, F) captured threshold among pre-/post-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and follow-up.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Changes in the (A, B) atrial and ventricular impedance, (C, D) lead sensing, and (E, F) captured threshold between the magnetic resonance (MR)-conditional and conventional groups at pre-/post-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and follow-up.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Niehaus M, Tebbenjohanns J. Electromagnetic interference in patients with implanted pacemakers or cardioverter-defibrillators. Heart. 2001;86:246–248. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Quint DJ. Indications for emergent MRI of the central nervous system. JAMA. 2000;283:853–855. - PubMed
    1. Kalin R, Stanton MS. Current clinical issues for MRI scanning of pacemaker and defibrillator patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005;28:326–328. - PubMed
    1. Hayes DL, Holmes DR, Jr, Gray JE. Effect of 1.5 tesla nuclear magnetic resonance imaging scanner on implanted permanent pacemakers. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;10:782–786. - PubMed
    1. Shellock FG, Tkach JA, Ruggieri PM, Masaryk TJ. Cardiac pacemakers, ICDs, and loop recorder: evaluation of translational attraction using conventional (“long-bore”) and “short-bore” 1.5- and 3.0-Tesla MR systems. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2003;5:387–397. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources