Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 4;19(1):103.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2012-z.

The impact of varus angulation on proximal fractures of the ulna

Affiliations

The impact of varus angulation on proximal fractures of the ulna

Xuchao Shi et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: We studied anteromedial varus angulation (VA) in the proximal third of the ulna. The importance of restoration of the anatomical orientation of the ulnar after a proximal fracture is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of minimal proximal ulna malunion on elbow function after a proximal ulna fracture.

Methods: We reviewed the follow-up of 60 patients who had undergone open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) of a proximal fracture of the ulna. Patients were divided into two groups, defined as either more or less than 5° of the difference between the VA of the fractured and contralateral ulna. The range of motion(ROM)of elbow flexion, extension and forearm rotation on both sides, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were measured.

Results: The average postoperative time was 3.1 years (1-5 years). Mean VA of the fractured arm was different from the normal side (7.8 ± 3.0 vs 12.7 ± 3.0). Compared to the unfractured arm there was a loss in mean elbow flexion (14.2 ± 4.9 vs 18.0 ± 5.9), extension ROM (7.1 ± 2.5 vs 9.3 ± 1.9, p < 0.05) and forearm rotation ROM (15.6 ± 8.6 vs 21.8 ± 9.5) that were statistically significant (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the MEPS and VAS score results between the two groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: The function of the elbow and forearm was restricted after VA malunion in the proximal ulna, but the quality of life of these patients had not been significantly affected. We suggest that orthopedic surgeons should assess whether the specialized structures of the proximal ulna are damaged or not before surgery. If the anatomy of the fractured bone cannot be restored through manipulation of the connected end directly, it is better to image the anatomical structure of the healthy side from using an elbow X-ray before surgery, and then reset using a pre-shaped plate to prevent malunion.

Keywords: Malunion; Proximal fractures of the ulna; Varus angulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethical Board Review of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China),the participant consent was written, the reference number was 2,356,543 and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki of 1964.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparison of VA measurements on both sides of the same patient

References

    1. Chalidis BE, Sachinis NC, Samoladas EP, Dimitriou CG, Pournaras JD. Ist ension band wiring technique the "gold standard" for the treatment of olecranon fractures? A long term functional outcome study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2008;3:9. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-3-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hak DJ, Golladay GJ. Olecranon fractures: treatment options. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8(4):266–275. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200007000-00007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Newman SD, Mauffrey C, Krikler S. Olecranon fractures. Injury. 2009;40(6):575–581. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.12.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sahajpal D, Wright TW. Proximal ulna fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34(2):357–362. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.12.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rouleau DM, Faber KJ, Athwal GS. The proximal ulna dorsal angulation: a radiographic study. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2010;19(1):26–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.07.005. - DOI - PubMed