Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 3;8(1):5444.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23633-7.

Early clinical experience with Guidezilla for transradial interventions in China

Affiliations

Early clinical experience with Guidezilla for transradial interventions in China

Min Ma et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Anatomic variations, calcified, tortuous, angulated lesions, and lack of support to increase the complexity of transradial intervention (TRI). Guidezilla is a mother-and-child catheter enabling increased support during complex interventions. As there are few published reports of its use, we describe our experience using this device to assist TRI in Chinese patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the Guidezilla guide extension catheter in complex coronary interventions. Thirty-two patients' clinical characteristics, angiographic details, and in-hospital outcome retrospectively collected between June 2015 and August 2017. Patients were 59.44 ± 10.48 years of age and 26 (81%) were men. The most frequent target vessels were the RCA (34%) and LAD (31%), patients had complex type C (53%) or B (47%) lesions, severely tortuous (41%) and angulated (22%).With the use of Guidezilla, technique success was 100%, and procedural success was 94%. The mean diameter of the deployed stents was 2.97 ± 0.37 mm, and the length was 27.19 ± 8.14 mm. The estimated mean distance of Guidezilla intubation into the target vessel was 7.66 ± 2.29 cm.The Guidezilla catheter extension safely facilitated successful completion of TRI in complex coronary artery lesions. This device can help interventionalists successfully perform difficult procedures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Characteristics of the Guidezilla and GuideLinerV2. ID = inner diameter, OD = outer diameter.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Successful treatment of coronary lesions with Guidezilla in elder patient with CKD. (A,B) showing outside medical coronary angiogram results. (C) BMW wire to the distal vessel of RCA. (D) Stenosis of lesions were predilated with 2.75 mm × 20 mm NC balloon. (E) Use the“buddy”wire to improve GC coaxial and support. (F) Guidezilla introduced into the RCA successfully. (GI) Promus Premier DES were deployed from the distal to the proximal RCA. (J) 2.5 mm anchor balloon technique. 6F Guidezilla was introduced into the distal LCX without difficulty. (K) 2.75 mm × 32 mm Promus Premier DES was delivered and was post-dilated with a 3.0 mm × 12 mm NC balloon. (L) The final coronary angiography shows a good result.

References

    1. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:1269–1275. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00064-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mann T, et al. Stenting in acute coronary syndromes: a comparison of radial versus femoral access sites. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:572–576. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00288-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Louvard Y, et al. Comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary angiography and angioplasty in octogenarians (the OCTOPLUS study) Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:1177–1180. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.07.089. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chase, A. J. et al. Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the M.O.R.T.A.L study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg). Heart. 94,1019–1025(2008). - PubMed
    1. Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta SR. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J. 2009;157:132–140. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.08.023. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types