The Impact of Recipient Site External Expansion in Fat Grafting Surgical Outcomes
- PMID: 29616164
- PMCID: PMC5865941
- DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001649
The Impact of Recipient Site External Expansion in Fat Grafting Surgical Outcomes
Abstract
Background: The fat grafting process includes the 4 phases of tissue harvesting, processing, recipient-site preparation, and reinjection. Among them, the preparation of the recipient site has never been exhaustively reviewed. We aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the methods to prepare the recipient site through external expansion with the resulting outcomes.
Methods: PubMed/Medline database was searched for studies on fat grafting recipient site preparation by applying the following algorithm: ((fat grafting) OR (lipofilling) OR (lipograft) AND (recipient site)). A priori criteria were used to review the resulting articles and identify those dealing with external expansion.
Results: Fourteen studies published from 2008 through 2016 met inclusion criteria (4 case reports, 6 retrospective, and 4 prospective studies), representing 1,274 treated patients. Two devices for preexpansion were used with different protocols: BRAVA system and Kiwi VAC-6000M with a PalmPump. The 13 studies that applied the BRAVA system reported large fat volume transplantation to the breast (average > 200 cc). The most common complications were localized edema (14.2%), temporary bruising, and superficial skin blisters (11.3%), while the most serious was pneumothorax (0.5%). The majority of the studies reported enhancement of fat graft survival, which ranged between 53% and 82% at 6 months to 1 year follow-up, and high satisfaction of patients and surgeon.
Conclusions: External expansion and fat grafting is a promising technique for breast reconstruction and augmentation. However, due to the overall low level of evidence of the available studies, further research is needed to validate the procedure.
References
-
- Gir P, Brown SA, Oni G, et al. Fat grafting: evidence-based review on autologous fat harvesting, processing, reinjection, and storage. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:249–258.. - PubMed
-
- Del Vecchio D, Rohrich RJ. A classification of clinical fat grafting: different problems, different solutions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:511–522.. - PubMed
-
- International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ISAPS). The international study on aesthetic/cosmetic procedures performed in 2016. Available at http://www.isaps.org/Media/Default/Current%20News/GlobalStatistics2016.pdf. Accessed October 5, 2017. - PubMed
-
- Negenborn VL, Groen JW, Smit JM, et al. The use of autologous fat grafting for treatment of scar tissue and scar-related conditions: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:31e–43e.. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous