Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jan;92(1093):20180048.
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180048. Epub 2018 Apr 9.

Normal tissue damage: its importance, history and challenges for the future

Affiliations
Review

Normal tissue damage: its importance, history and challenges for the future

Jacqueline P Williams et al. Br J Radiol. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Sir Oliver Scott, a philanthropist and radiation biologist and, therefore, the epitome of a gentleman and a scholar, was an early Director of the BECC Radiobiology Research Unit at Mount Vernon. His tenure preceded that of Jack Fowler, with both contributing to basic, translational and clinical thought and application in radiation across the globe. With respect to this review, Fowler's name in particular has remained synonymous with the use of models, both animal and mathematical, that assess and quantify the biological mechanisms that underlie radiation-associated normal tissue toxicities. An understanding of these effects is critical to the optimal use of radiation therapy in the clinic; however, the role that basic sciences play in clinical practice has been undergoing considerable change in recent years, particularly in the USA, where there has been a growing emphasis on engineering and imaging to improve radiation delivery, with empirical observations of clinical outcome taking the place of models underpinned by evidence from basic science experiments. In honour of Scott and Fowler's work, we have taken this opportunity to review how our respective fields of radiation biology and radiation physics have intertwined over the years, affecting the clinical use of radiation with respect to normal tissue outcomes. We discuss the past and current achievements, with the hope of encouraging a revived interest in physics and biology as they relate to radiation oncology practice, since, like Scott and Fowler, we share the goal of improving the future outlook for cancer patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Cosset JM. The dawn of radiotherapy, between strokes of genius, dramas and controversies. Cancer Radiother 2016; 20: 595–600. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2016.08.123 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Willers H, Heilmann HP, Beck-Bornholdt HP. One hundred years of radiotherapy. Historical origins and development of fractionated irradiation in German speaking countries. Strahlenther Onkol 1998; 174: 53–63. - PubMed
    1. Rosenthal DI, Glatstein E. We’ve got a treatment, but what’s the disease? Or a brief history of hypofractionation and its relationship to stereotactic radiosurgery. Oncologist 1996; 1: 1–7. - PubMed
    1. Baskar R, Lee KA, Yeo R, Yeoh KW. Cancer and radiation therapy: current advances and future directions. Int J Med Sci 2012; 9: 193–9. doi: 10.7150/ijms.3635 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ganz JC. Stereotactic and radiosurgery research in Sweden. Prog Brain Res 2014; 215: 57–66. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63520-4.00006-5 - DOI - PubMed