What exactly is 'N' in cell culture and animal experiments?
- PMID: 29617358
- PMCID: PMC5902037
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005282
What exactly is 'N' in cell culture and animal experiments?
Abstract
Biologists determine experimental effects by perturbing biological entities or units. When done appropriately, independent replication of the entity-intervention pair contributes to the sample size (N) and forms the basis of statistical inference. If the wrong entity-intervention pair is chosen, an experiment cannot address the question of interest. We surveyed a random sample of published animal experiments from 2011 to 2016 where interventions were applied to parents and effects examined in the offspring, as regulatory authorities provide clear guidelines on replication with such designs. We found that only 22% of studies (95% CI = 17%-29%) replicated the correct entity-intervention pair and thus made valid statistical inferences. Nearly half of the studies (46%, 95% CI = 38%-53%) had pseudoreplication while 32% (95% CI = 26%-39%) provided insufficient information to make a judgement. Pseudoreplication artificially inflates the sample size, and thus the evidence for a scientific claim, resulting in false positives. We argue that distinguishing between biological units, experimental units, and observational units clarifies where replication should occur, describe the criteria for genuine replication, and provide concrete examples of in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo experimental designs.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Comment in
-
Population sampling affects pseudoreplication.PLoS Biol. 2018 Oct 15;16(10):e2007054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2007054. eCollection 2018 Oct. PLoS Biol. 2018. PMID: 30321169 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Training in experimental design and statistics is essential: Response to Jordan.PLoS Biol. 2018 Oct 15;16(10):e3000022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000022. eCollection 2018 Oct. PLoS Biol. 2018. PMID: 30321171 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Dunn HL. Application of statistical methods in physiology. Physiological Reviews. 1929;9(2): 275–398.
-
- Haseman JK, Hogan MD. Selection of the experimental unit in teratology studies. Teratology. 1975;12: 165–171. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420120209 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hurlbert SH. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr. 1984;54(2): 187–211.
-
- Prosser JI. Replicate or lie. Environ Microbiol. 2010;12(7): 1806–1810. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02201.x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ramirez CC, Fuentes-Contreras E, Rodriguez LC, Niemeyer HM. Pseudoreplication and its frequency in olfactometric laboratory studies. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2000;26(6): 1423–1431.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
