Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr;18(4):3-20.
doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1431322.

Beyond Consent: Building Trusting Relationships With Diverse Populations in Precision Medicine Research

Stephanie A Kraft  1 , Mildred K Cho  2 , Katherine Gillespie  3 , Meghan Halley  3 , Nina Varsava  2 , Kelly E Ormond  2 , Harold S Luft  3 , Benjamin S Wilfond  1 , Sandra Soo-Jin Lee  2
Affiliations

Beyond Consent: Building Trusting Relationships With Diverse Populations in Precision Medicine Research

Stephanie A Kraft et al. Am J Bioeth. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

With the growth of precision medicine research on health data and biospecimens, research institutions will need to build and maintain long-term, trusting relationships with patient-participants. While trust is important for all research relationships, the longitudinal nature of precision medicine research raises particular challenges for facilitating trust when the specifics of future studies are unknown. Based on focus groups with racially and ethnically diverse patients, we describe several factors that influence patient trust and potential institutional approaches to building trustworthiness. Drawing on these findings, we suggest several considerations for research institutions seeking to cultivate long-term, trusting relationships with patients: (1) Address the role of history and experience on trust, (2) engage concerns about potential group harm, (3) address cultural values and communication barriers, and (4) integrate patient values and expectations into oversight and governance structures.

Keywords: biobank; electronic medical records; genetic research; informed consent; precision medicine; research ethics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Anderson N, and Edwards K. 2010. Building a chain of trust: Using policy and practice to enhance trustworthy clinical data discovery and sharing. Proceedings of the 2010 Workshop on Governance of Technology, Information and Policies, 15–20. doi: 10.1145/1920320.1920323 - DOI
    1. Beecher HK. 1966. Ethics and clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine 274(24): 1354–60. - PubMed
    1. Boulware IE, Cooper LA, Ratner LE, LaVeist TA, and Power NR. 2003. Race and trust in the health care system. Public Health Reports 118: 358–65. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braunstein JB, Sherber NS, Schulman SP, Ding EL, and Powe NR. 2008. Race, medical researcher distrust, perceived harm, and willingness to participate in cardiovascular prevention trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 87(1):1–9. - PubMed
    1. Brothers KB, Morrison DR, and Clayton EW. 2011. Two large-scale surveys on community attitudes toward an opt-out biobank. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 155(12): 2982–90. - PMC - PubMed