The Healthcare Cost Burden of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Alberta, Canada
- PMID: 29623635
- PMCID: PMC6249191
- DOI: 10.1007/s41669-017-0061-0
The Healthcare Cost Burden of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Alberta, Canada
Abstract
Objectives: Little is known about the cost burden of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) on healthcare systems. Accordingly, we examined the long-term trends of healthcare costs for AMI in the province of Alberta, Canada.
Methods: We linked five Albertan health databases, including ambulatory care, hospitalization, practitioner claims, pharmaceutical information network, and population registry to identify patients with a primary diagnosis of AMI between 2004 and 2013. We used the Alberta Interactive Health Data Application to provide unit costs for ambulatory care and inpatient services, claim paid amounts for physician services, and the Alberta Drug Benefit List for drug prices. Healthcare costs for AMI were grouped into ambulatory care, hospitalization, physician costs, and drug costs. All costs were converted to 2016 Canadian dollar values ($Can).
Results: A total of 52,912 patients with AMI were included in the analysis. Patient age decreased over time, as did the proportion of females. AMI cost the Alberta healthcare system Can$1033 million during the study period; of which the largest proportion was hospitalization costs (Can$716.4 million, 63.1%), followed by drug costs (Can$147.2 million, 21.1%), ambulatory care costs (Can$94.5 million, 8.8%) and physician costs (Can$74.9 million, 7.0%). The cost per AMI hospitalization decreased from Can$14,116 in 2004 to Can$11,792 in 2013 (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Healthcare costs for AMI are significant; however, they decreased slightly during the study period. Hospital services accounted for the largest share of the costs. There are opportunities for further savings in AMI care.
Conflict of interest statement
Data availability statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from Alberta Health; however, restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are, however, available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission from Alberta Health.
Conflict of interest
Dat T. Tran, Robert Welsh, Arto Ohinmaa, Thanh Nguyen, and Padma Kaul declare that they have no conflicts of interest and they received no financial support for this manuscript.
Figures
References
-
- Turpie AG. Burden of disease: medical and economic impact of acute coronary syndromes. Am J Manag Care. 2006;12(16 Suppl):S430–S434. - PubMed
-
- Mendis S, Puska P, Norrving B, World Health Organization., World Heart Federation., World Stroke Organization. Global atlas on cardiovascular disease prevention and control. Geneva: World Health Organization in collaboration with the World Heart Federation and the World Stroke Organization; 2011.
-
- Curtis JP, Schreiner G, Wang Y, Chen J, Spertus JA, Rumsfeld JS, Brindis RG, Krumholz HM. All-cause readmission and repeat revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort of medicare patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(10):903–907. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.076. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Heidenreich PA, Trogdon JG, Khavjou OA, Butler J, Dracup K, Ezekowitz MD, Finkelstein EA, Hong Y, Johnston SC, Khera A, Lloyd-Jones DM, Nelson SA, Nichol G, Orenstein D, Wilson PWF, Woo YJ. Forecasting the future of cardiovascular disease in the united states: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;24:2011. - PubMed
-
- Public Health Agency of Canada. Tracking heart disease and stroke in Canada, 2009. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2009.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
