The Relationship between Neonatal Circumcision, Urinary Tract Infection, and Health
- PMID: 29623700
- PMCID: PMC6119846
- DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.180006
The Relationship between Neonatal Circumcision, Urinary Tract Infection, and Health
Abstract
The risk-benefit profile of neonatal circumcision is not clear. Most studies have focused on urinary tract infections but other health sequelae have not been evaluated. While evidence supports benefits of circumcision, a lack of randomized trials has been cited as a weakness. National guidelines provide mixed recommendations regarding neonatal circumcision. We review the weight of evidence and utilize current statistical methodology on observational data to examine the risks and benefits of neonatal circumcision.
Keywords: Foreskin; Hypertension; Penis; Pyelonephritis; Urinary tract infections.
Copyright © 2018 Korean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Eisenberg is an adviser of the Sandstone Diagnostics and Glow, but he made no influence on this work in relation with the company or its products. Other authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
-
- American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision. Male circumcision. Pediatrics. 2012;130:e756–e785. - PubMed
-
- Morris BJ, Klausner JD, Krieger JN, Willcox BJ, Crouse PD, Pollock N. Canadian Pediatrics Society position statement on newborn circumcision: a risk-benefit analysis revisited. Can J Urol. 2016;23:8495–8502. - PubMed
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Preventation (CDC) Recommendations for providers counseling male patients and parents regarding male circumcision and the prevention of HIV infection, STIs, and other health outcomes. Atranta (GA): CDC; 2014.
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources