A multicenter evaluation of a new EUS core biopsy needle: Experience in 200 patients
- PMID: 29623911
- PMCID: PMC6482605
- DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_53_17
A multicenter evaluation of a new EUS core biopsy needle: Experience in 200 patients
Abstract
Background and objectives: We present a multicenter study of a new endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) needle (Acquire, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA). The aim of the study was to analyze the needle's clinical performance when sampling solid lesions and to assess the safety of this device.
Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective study of patients undergoing EUS-FNB during July 1-November 15, 2016.
Results: Two hundred patients (121 males and 79 females) underwent EUS-FNB of solid lesions with the Acquire needle. Lesions included solid pancreatic masses (n = 109), adenopathy (n = 45), submucosal lesions (n = 34), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 8), liver lesions (n = 6), and other (n = 8). Mean lesion size was 30.6 mm (range: 3-100 mm). The mean number of passes per target lesion was 3 (range: 1-7). Rapid onsite cytologic evaluation (ROSE) by a cytologist was performed in all cases. Tissue obtained by EUS-FNB was adequate for evaluation and diagnosis by ROSE in 197/200 cases (98.5%). Data regarding the presence or absence of a core of tissue obtained after EUS-FNB were available in 145/200 procedures. In 131/145 (90%) of cases, a core of tissue was obtained. Thirteen out of 200 patients (6.5%) underwent some form of repeat EUS-based tissue acquisition after EUS-FNB with the Acquire needle. There were no adverse events.
Conclusion: Overall, this study showed a high rate of tissue adequacy and production of a tissue core with this device with no adverse events seen in 200 patients. Comparative studies of different FNB needles are warranted in the future to help identify which needle type and size is ideal in different clinical settings.
Keywords: Acquire; EUS; fine-needle biopsy; lesions; tissue core.
Conflict of interest statement
None
Figures
References
-
- Folkers ME, Adler DG. Endoscopic ultrasound for non-gastroenterologists: What you need to know. Hosp Pract. 2011;39:56–69. - PubMed
-
- Adler DG, Jacobson BC, Davila RE, et al. ASGE guideline: Complications of EUS. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:8–12. Erratum in: Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:502. - PubMed
-
- Affolter KE, Schmidt RL, Matynia AP, et al. Needle size has only a limited effect on outcomes in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:1026–34. - PubMed
-
- Levy MJ, Wiersema MJ. EUS-guided Trucut biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:417–26. - PubMed
-
- Ginès A, Wiersema MJ, Clain JE, et al. Prospective study of a Trucut needle for performing EUS-guided biopsy with EUS-guided FNA rescue. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:597–601. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
