Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May 31;84(12):e00334-18.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.00334-18. Print 2018 Jun 15.

Mechanisms of Mineral Substrate Acquisition in a Thermoacidophile

Affiliations

Mechanisms of Mineral Substrate Acquisition in a Thermoacidophile

Maximiliano J Amenabar et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. .

Abstract

The thermoacidophile Acidianus is widely distributed in Yellowstone National Park hot springs that span large gradients in pH (1.60 to 4.84), temperature (42 to 90°C), and mineralogical composition. To characterize the potential role of flexibility in mineral-dependent energy metabolism in contributing to the widespread ecological distribution of this organism, we characterized the spectrum of minerals capable of supporting metabolism and the mechanisms that it uses to access these minerals. The energy metabolism of Acidianus strain DS80 was supported by elemental sulfur (S0), a variety of iron (hydr)oxides, and arsenic sulfide. Strain DS80 reduced, oxidized, and disproportionated S0 Cells growing via S0 reduction and disproportionation did not require direct access to the mineral to reduce it, whereas cells growing via S0 oxidation did require direct access, observations that are attributable to the role of H2S produced by S0 reduction/disproportionation in solubilizing and increasing the bioavailability of S0 Cells growing via iron (hydr)oxide reduction did not require access to the mineral, suggesting that the cells reduce Fe(III) that is being leached by the acidic growth medium. Cells growing via oxidation of arsenic sulfide with Fe(III) did not require access to the mineral to grow. The stoichiometry of reactants to products indicates that cells oxidize soluble As(III) released from oxidation of arsenic sulfide by aqueous Fe(III). Taken together, these observations underscore the importance of feedbacks between abiotic and biotic reactions in influencing the bioavailability of mineral substrates and defining ecological niches capable of supporting microbial metabolism.IMPORTANCE Mineral sources of electron donor and acceptor that support microbial metabolism are abundant in the natural environment. However, the spectrum of minerals capable of supporting a given microbial strain and the mechanisms that are used to access these minerals in support of microbial energy metabolism are often unknown, in particular among thermoacidophiles. Here, we show that the thermoacidophile Acidianus strain DS80 is adapted to use a variety of iron (hydro)oxide minerals, elemental sulfur, and arsenic sulfide to support growth. Cells rely on a complex interplay of abiologically and biologically catalyzed reactions that increase the solubility or bioavailability of minerals, thereby enabling their use in microbial metabolism.

Keywords: Yellowstone; acidophile; arsenic; elemental sulfur disproportionation; elemental sulfur oxidation; elemental sulfur reduction; ferric iron; iron reduction; realgar oxidation; thermophile.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
The presence (black squares) or absence (white squares) of Acidianus sp. sor amplicons in DNA extracts from sediments collected from 73 hot springs in Yellowstone National Park plotted as a function of the pH and temperature of those springs.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Sulfide concentrations (A) and cell concentrations (B) in cultures of strain DS80 grown autotrophically with H2 as electron donor and S0 as electron acceptor. S0 was provided in the bulk medium (control) or was sequestered in dialysis membranes (pore sizes of 12 to 14 kDa or 6 to 8 kDa) to prevent physical contact with the bulk mineral.
FIG 3
FIG 3
Fe(II) concentrations (A) and cell concentrations (B) in cultures of strain DS80 cultivated autotrophically with S0 as electron donor and Fe(III) (provided as ferric sulfate) as electron acceptor. S0 was provided in the bulk medium (control) or was sequestered in dialysis membranes (pore sizes of 12 to 14 kDa or 6 to 8 kDa) to prevent physical contact with the bulk mineral.
FIG 4
FIG 4
Sulfide concentrations (A), sulfate concentrations (B), cell concentrations (C), and available Gibbs free energy (ΔG) per mole of electrons transferred (D) in cultures of strain DS80 grown autotrophically with S0 provided as electron donor and acceptor (S0 disproportionation). S0 was provided in the bulk medium (control) or was sequestered in dialysis membranes (pore sizes of 12 to 14 kDa or 6 to 8 kDa) to prevent physical contact with the bulk mineral.
FIG 5
FIG 5
Fe(II) concentrations (A) and cell concentrations (B) in cultures of strain DS80 grown autotrophically with H2 as electron donor and ferrihydrite as electron acceptor. Ferrihydrite was provided in the bulk medium (control) or was sequestered in dialysis membranes (pore sizes of 12 to 14 kDa or 6 to 8 kDa) to prevent physical contact with the bulk mineral. Note the scale difference in the y axis of panel B with respect to other growth conditions.
FIG 6
FIG 6
As(V) concentrations (A), Fe(II) concentrations (B), and cell concentrations (C) in cultures of strain DS80 grown autotrophically with realgar (α-As4S4) as electron donor and Fe(III) (provided as ferric sulfate) as electron acceptor. Realgar was provided in the bulk medium (control) or was sequestered in dialysis membranes (pore sizes of 12 to 14 kDa or 6 to 8 kDa) to prevent physical contact with the bulk mineral. Note the scale difference in the y axis of panel C with respect to other growth conditions.

References

    1. Boyd ES, Hamilton TL, Spear JR, Lavin M, Peters JW. 2010. [FeFe]-hydrogenase in Yellowstone National Park: evidence for dispersal limitation and phylogenetic niche conservatism. ISME J 4:1485–1495. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.76. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cox A, Shock EL, Havig JR. 2011. The transition to microbial photosynthesis in hot spring ecosystems. Chem Geol 280:344–351. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2010.11.022. - DOI
    1. Boyd ES, Fecteau KM, Havig JR, Shock EL, Peters JW. 2012. Modeling the habitat range of phototrophs in Yellowstone National Park: toward the development of a comprehensive fitness landscape. Front Microbiol 3:221. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00221. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hamilton TL, Vogl K, Bryant DA, Boyd ES, Peters JW. 2012. Environmental constraints defining the distribution, composition, and evolution of chlorophototrophs in thermal features of Yellowstone National Park. Geobiology 10:236–249. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4669.2011.00296.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amend JP, Shock EL. 2001. Energetics of overall metabolic reactions of thermophilic and hyperthermophilic Archaea and Bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 25:175–243. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2001.tb00576.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types