Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 1;7(4):328-335.
doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.98.

Assessing and Improving Performance: A Longitudinal Evaluation of Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in a Canadian Health Region

William Hall  1 , Neale Smith  1 , Craig Mitton  1 , Bonnie Urquhart  2 , Stirling Bryan  1   3
Affiliations

Assessing and Improving Performance: A Longitudinal Evaluation of Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in a Canadian Health Region

William Hall et al. Int J Health Policy Manag. .

Abstract

Background: In order to meet the challenges presented by increasing demand and scarcity of resources, healthcare organizations are faced with difficult decisions related to resource allocation. Tools to facilitate evaluation and improvement of these processes could enable greater transparency and more optimal distribution of resources.

Methods: The Resource Allocation Performance Assessment Tool (RAPAT) was implemented in a healthcare organization in British Columbia, Canada. Recommendations for improvement were delivered, and a follow up evaluation exercise was conducted to assess the trajectory of the organization's priority setting and resource allocation (PSRA) process 2 years post the original evaluation.

Results: Implementation of RAPAT in the pilot organization identified strengths and weaknesses of the organization's PSRA process at the time of the original evaluation. Strengths included the use of criteria and evidence, an ability to reallocate resources, and the involvement of frontline staff in the process. Weaknesses included training, communication, and lack of program budgeting. Although the follow up revealed a regression from a more formal PSRA process, a legacy of explicit resource allocation was reported to be providing ongoing benefit for the organization.

Conclusion: While past studies have taken a cross-sectional approach, this paper introduces the first longitudinal evaluation of PSRA in a healthcare organization. By including the strengths, weaknesses, and evolution of one organization's journey, the authors' intend that this paper will assist other healthcare leaders in meeting the challenges of allocating scarce resources.

Keywords: Evaluation; Priority Setting; Resource Allocation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Smith N, Mitton C, Cornelissen E, Gibson J, Peacock S. Using evaluation theory in priority setting and resource allocation. J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(5):655–671. doi: 10.1108/14777261211256963. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mitton C, Donaldson C. Health care priority setting: principles, practice and challenges. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2004;2:3. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-2-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Donaldson C, Mitton C. Priority Setting Toolkit: Guide to the Use of Economics in Healthcare Decision Making. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 2004.
    1. Smith N, Mitton C, Bryan S. et al. Decision maker perceptions of resource allocation processes in Canadian health care organizations: a national survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:247. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-247. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sibbald SL, Gibson JL, Singer PA, Upshur R, Martin DK. Evaluating priority setting success in healthcare: a pilot study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:131. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources