Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Sep;21(3):295-319.
doi: 10.1007/s10567-018-0262-9.

Transformation of Adolescent Peer Relations in the Social Media Context: Part 2-Application to Peer Group Processes and Future Directions for Research

Affiliations
Review

Transformation of Adolescent Peer Relations in the Social Media Context: Part 2-Application to Peer Group Processes and Future Directions for Research

Jacqueline Nesi et al. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

As social media use becomes increasingly widespread among adolescents, research in this area has accumulated rapidly. Researchers have shown a growing interest in the impact of social media on adolescents' peer experiences, including the ways that the social media context shapes a variety of peer relations constructs. This paper represents Part 2 of a two-part theoretical review. In this review, we offer a new model for understanding the transformative role of social media in adolescents' peer experiences, with the goal of stimulating future empirical work that is grounded in theory. The transformation framework suggests that the features of the social media context transform adolescents' peer experiences by changing their frequency or immediacy, amplifying demands, altering their qualitative nature, and/or offering new opportunities for compensatory or novel behaviors. In the current paper, we consider the ways that social media may transform peer relations constructs that often occur at the group level. Our review focuses on three key constructs: peer victimization, peer status, and peer influence. We selectively review and highlight existing evidence for the transformation of these domains through social media. In addition, we discuss methodological considerations and key conceptual principles for future work. The current framework offers a new theoretical perspective through which peer relations researchers may consider adolescent social media use.

Keywords: Adolescents; Cyber victimization; Peer influence; Peer status; Review; Social media.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The transformation framework with examples of transformation of three group-level peer constructs

References

    1. Agatston PW, Kowalski R, & Limber S (2007). Students’ perspectives on cyber bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), S59–S60. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Almquist Y (2009). Peer status in school and adult disease risk: A 30-year follow-up study of disease-specific morbidity in a Stockholm cohort. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 63(12), 1028–1034. 10.1136/jech.2009.088377. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Almquist YB, & Östberg V (2013). Social relationships and subsequent health-related behaviours: Linkages between adolescent peer status and levels of adult smoking in a Stockholm cohort: Peer status in school and adult smoking. Addiction, 108(3), 629–637. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.04097.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arseniev-Koehler A, Lee H, McCormick T, & Moreno MA (2016). #Proana: Pro-eating disorder socialization on twitter. Journal of Adolescent Health, 58(6), 659–664. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.02.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baker CK, & Carreño PK (2016). Understanding the role of technology in adolescent dating and dating violence. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(1), 308–320. 10.1007/s10826-015-0196-5. - DOI

Publication types