Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul;61(4):474-477.
doi: 10.3340/jkns.2017.0404.012. Epub 2018 Apr 10.

Cerebral Aneurysms in Judicial Precedents

Kyeong-Seok Lee  1 , Jae-Jun Shim  1 , Jae-Hyun Shim  1 , Jae-Sang Oh  1 , Seok-Mann Yoon  1
Affiliations

Cerebral Aneurysms in Judicial Precedents

Kyeong-Seok Lee et al. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2018 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: From November 30, 2016, the Korean Government carried the revised Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Act into effect. Mediation will start automatically without agreements of the defendant, when the outcome of the patient was death, coma more than a month or severe disability. Cerebral aneurysm has a definite risk of bad outcome, especially in the worst condition. Any surgical intervention to this lesion has its own high risk of complications. Recently, Seoul central district court decided 50% responsibility of the doctors who made a rupture of the aneurysm during coiling (2015Ga-Dan5243104). We reviewed judicial precedents related to cerebral aneurysms in lawsuit using a web search.

Methods: We searched judicial precedents at a web search of the Supreme Court, using the key words, "cerebral aneurysm".

Results: There were 15 precedents, six from the Supreme Court, seven from the High Court, and two from district courts. Seven precedents were related to the causation analysis, such as work-relationship. Five precedents were malpractice suits related bad results or complications. Remaining three precedents were related to the insurance payment. In five malpractice precedents, two precedents of the Supreme Court reversed former two precedents of the High Court.

Conclusion: Judicial precedents on the cerebral aneurysm included not only malpractice suits, but also causation analysis or insurance payment. Attention to these subjects is needed. We also need education of the independent medical examination. To avoid medical disputes, shared decision making seems to be useful, especially in cases of high risk condition or procedures.

Keywords: Causality; Cerebral Aneurysm; Expert Testimony; Malpractice; Negotiating.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Subjective distribution of precedents related to cerebral aneurysms.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bean JR. Defensive medicine: rational response to irrational risk. World Neurosurg. 2016;94:568–569. - PubMed
    1. Bekelis K, Missios S, Wong K, MacKenzie TA. The practice of cranial neurosurgery and the malpractice liability environment in the United States. PloS One. 2015;10:e0121191. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bird S. Failure to follow up CT reports. Aust Fam physician. 2007;36:949–950. - PubMed
    1. Chodos JE. Should there be specialty courts for medical malpractice litigation? Col Med Rev. 2015;1:10–22.
    1. Edlow JA, Caplan LR. Avoiding pitfalls in the diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:29–36. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources