Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 10;16(1):48.
doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1032-8.

The perceived organizational impact of the gender gap across a Canadian department of medicine and proposed strategies to combat it: a qualitative study

Affiliations

The perceived organizational impact of the gender gap across a Canadian department of medicine and proposed strategies to combat it: a qualitative study

Reena Pattani et al. BMC Med. .

Abstract

Background: Despite the gender parity existing in medical schools for over three decades, women remain underrepresented in academic medical centers, particularly in senior ranks and in leadership roles. This has consequences for patient care, education, research, and workplace culture within healthcare organizations. This study was undertaken to explore the perspectives of faculty members at a single department of medicine on the impact of the existing gender gap on organizational effectiveness and workplace culture, and to identify systems-based strategies to mitigate the gap.

Methods: The study took place at a large university department of medicine in Toronto, Canada, with six affiliated hospitals. In this qualitative study, semi-structured individual interviews were conducted between May and September 2016 with full-time faculty members who held clinical and university-based appointments. Transcripts of the interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Three authors independently reviewed the transcripts to determine a preliminary list of codes and establish a coding framework. A modified audit consensus coding approach was applied; a single analyst reviewed all the transcripts and a second analyst audited 20% of the transcripts in each round of coding. Following each round, inter-rater reliability was determined, discrepancies were resolved through discussion, and modifications were made as needed to the coding framework. The analysis revealed faculty members' perceptions of the gender gap, potential contributing factors, organizational impacts, and possible solutions to bridge the gap.

Results: Of the 43 full-time faculty members who participated in the survey (29 of whom self-identified as female), most participants were aware of the existing gender gap within academic medicine. Participants described social exclusion, reinforced stereotypes, and unprofessional behaviors as consequences of the gap on organizational effectiveness and culture. They suggested improvements in (1) the processes for recruitment, hiring, and promotion; (2) inclusiveness of the work environment; (3) structures for mentorship; and (4) ongoing monitoring of the gap.

Conclusion: The existing gender gap in academic medicine may have negative consequences for organizational effectiveness and workplace culture but many systems-based strategies to mitigate the gap exist. Although these solutions warrant rigorous evaluation, they are feasible to institute within most healthcare organizations immediately.

Keywords: Academic medicine; Equity; Gender gap; Healthcare human resources; Organizational effectiveness; Workplace culture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We obtained ethics approval from the Research Ethics Boards of the University of Toronto (REB 32726) and St. Michael’s Hospital (REB 15–273) in Toronto, Canada. Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to the interviews.

Consent for publication

We asked participants for permission to use de-identified quote(s) prior to inclusion in the report and/or publication. We provided participants with a draft of the report for review.

Competing interests

RP and SES are members of the DOM that was studied. SES is funded by a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair and Mary Trimmer Chair in Geriatric Medicine.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. Cabot R. Women in medicine. 1915. JAMA. 2015;314(10):1076. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.11972. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Metaxa V. Is this (still) a man's world? Crit Care. 2013;17(1):112. doi: 10.1186/cc11859. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. The state of women in academic medicine: the pipeline and pathways to leadership 2015–16. https://www.aamc.org/members/gwims/statistics. Accessed 17 Apr 2017.
    1. Wehner M, Nead K, Linos K, Linos E. Plenty of moustaches but not enough women: cross sectional study of medical leaders. BMJ. 2015;351:h6311. 10.1136/bmj.h6311. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Filardo G, daGraca B, Sass D, Pollock B, Smith E, Martinez M. Trends and comparison of female first authorship in high impact medical journals: observational study (1994–2014) BMJ. 2016;352:i847. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i847. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources