Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 May;83(5):873-883.
doi: 10.1002/ana.25227. Epub 2018 Apr 30.

Ischemic stroke in cancer patients: A review of an underappreciated pathology

Affiliations
Review

Ischemic stroke in cancer patients: A review of an underappreciated pathology

Babak B Navi et al. Ann Neurol. 2018 May.

Abstract

Currently 1 in 10 patients with ischemic stroke have comorbid cancer, and this frequency is expected to increase with continued advances in cancer therapeutics prolonging median survival. Well known for its association with venous thrombosis, cancer has recently emerged as a significant risk factor for arterial thromboembolism, including stroke; however, the underlying mechanisms are uncertain. In addition, the optimal strategies to prevent and acutely treat stroke in cancer patients are yet to be established. This review summarizes the current evidence on ischemic stroke risk, biomarkers, pathophysiology, treatments, and prognosis in cancer patients, emphasizing knowledge gaps and the potential strategies to address them. Ann Neurol 2018;83:873-883.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential Conflicts of Interest

Nothing to report.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Potential reasons for cancer patients’ increased risk of ischemic stroke. Diagram depicting the possible underlying explanations for cancer patients’ heightened stroke risk. These include: (a) biological factors, such as cancer-mediated hypercoagulability, adverse effects of cancer treatments, and increased psychological stress after cancer diagnosis; (b) diagnosis-related factors, such as detection bias from heightened surveillance and underutilization or frequent interruption of antithrombotics because of bleeding concerns; and (c) shared risk factors, such as atrial fibrillation, obesity, and tobacco use. Most likely multiples factors are at play, some of which may be synergistic.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Hypothesized line graph of cancer patients’ suspected risk of ischemic stroke over time. Based on the totality of current evidence, we hypothesize a U-point curve whereby risks are increased immediately before and in the year after cancer diagnosis when cancer-mediated hypercoagulability is generally at its peak, followed by a reduction or normalization in stroke risk for several years among those whose cancers are cured or put into long-term remission, followed again years later by progressively increasing risk due to the long-term effects of cancer treatments, particularly radiation vasculopathy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2013. National Cancer Institute; [Accessed November 1, 2017]. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2013/
    1. Henley SJ, Singh SD, King J, et al. Invasive cancer incidence and survival--United States, 2012. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64:1353–1358. - PubMed
    1. Weir HK, Thompson TD, Soman A, et al. Meeting the healthy people 2020 objectives to reduce cancer mortality. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015;12:E104. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135:e146–e603. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blom JW, Doggen CJ, Osanto S, Rosendaal FR. Malignancies, prothrombotic mutations, and the risk of venous thrombosis. JAMA. 2005;293:715–722. - PubMed

Publication types