Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 27:9:402.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00402. eCollection 2018.

Global Repetition Influences Contextual Cueing

Affiliations

Global Repetition Influences Contextual Cueing

Xuelian Zang et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Our visual system has a striking ability to improve visual search based on the learning of repeated ambient regularities, an effect named contextual cueing. Whereas most of the previous studies investigated contextual cueing effect with the same number of repeated and non-repeated search displays per block, the current study focused on whether a global repetition frequency formed by different presentation ratios between the repeated and non-repeated configurations influence contextual cueing effect. Specifically, the number of repeated and non-repeated displays presented in each block was manipulated: 12:12, 20:4, 4:20, and 4:4 in Experiments 1-4, respectively. The results revealed a significant contextual cueing effect when the global repetition frequency is high (≥1:1 ratio) in Experiments 1, 2, and 4, given that processing of repeated displays was expedited relative to non-repeated displays. Nevertheless, the contextual cueing effect reduced to a non-significant level when the repetition frequency reduced to 4:20 in Experiment 3. These results suggested that the presentation frequency of repeated relative to the non-repeated displays could influence the strength of contextual cueing. In other words, global repetition statistics could be a crucial factor to mediate contextual cueing effect.

Keywords: contextual cueing; contextual transfer; global repetition; implicit learning; presentation ratio.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Example of the visual stimlus in the experiments.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Search Performances as a function of epochs in three experiments. Lines with circles depict the mean RTs for repeated displays, whereas the lines with dots denote non-repeated displays.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Assumpção L., Shi Z., Zang X., Müller H. J., Geyer T. (2015). Contextual cueing: implicit memory of tactile context facilitates tactile search. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 77 1212–1222. 10.3758/s13414-015-0848-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beesley T., Vadillo M. A., Pearson D., Shanks D. R. (2015). Pre-exposure of repeated search configurations facilitates subsequent contextual cuing of visual search. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 41 348–362. 10.1037/xlm0000033 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brady T. F., Chun M. M. (2007). Spatial constraints on learning in visual search: modeling contextual cuing. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 33 798–815. 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.798 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brainard D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spat. Vis. 10 433–436. 10.1163/156856897X00357 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brockmole J. R., Castelhano M. S., Henderson J. M. (2006). Contextual cueing in naturalistic scenes: global and local contexts. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 32 699–706. 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.699 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources