Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 10;42(5):92.
doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-0940-7.

Accurate Diabetes Risk Stratification Using Machine Learning: Role of Missing Value and Outliers

Affiliations

Accurate Diabetes Risk Stratification Using Machine Learning: Role of Missing Value and Outliers

Md Maniruzzaman et al. J Med Syst. .

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is a group of metabolic diseases in which blood sugar levels are too high. About 8.8% of the world was diabetic in 2017. It is projected that this will reach nearly 10% by 2045. The major challenge is that when machine learning-based classifiers are applied to such data sets for risk stratification, leads to lower performance. Thus, our objective is to develop an optimized and robust machine learning (ML) system under the assumption that missing values or outliers if replaced by a median configuration will yield higher risk stratification accuracy. This ML-based risk stratification is designed, optimized and evaluated, where: (i) the features are extracted and optimized from the six feature selection techniques (random forest, logistic regression, mutual information, principal component analysis, analysis of variance, and Fisher discriminant ratio) and combined with ten different types of classifiers (linear discriminant analysis, quadratic discriminant analysis, naïve Bayes, Gaussian process classification, support vector machine, artificial neural network, Adaboost, logistic regression, decision tree, and random forest) under the hypothesis that both missing values and outliers when replaced by computed medians will improve the risk stratification accuracy. Pima Indian diabetic dataset (768 patients: 268 diabetic and 500 controls) was used. Our results demonstrate that on replacing the missing values and outliers by group median and median values, respectively and further using the combination of random forest feature selection and random forest classification technique yields an accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and area under the curve as: 92.26%, 95.96%, 79.72%, 91.14%, 91.20%, and 0.93, respectively. This is an improvement of 10% over previously developed techniques published in literature. The system was validated for its stability and reliability. RF-based model showed the best performance when outliers are replaced by median values.

Keywords: Diabetes; Feature selection; Machine learning; Missing values; Outliers; Risk stratification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Ethics approval

We used secondary dataset taken from the UCI website (https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Pima+Indians+Diabetes). No ethics approval is required for this dataset.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preparation of diabetic data by missing value replacement and outlier removal
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Architecture of the machine learning system
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Concept showing the hypothesis link between outlier removals in relation to the performance of the ML system
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Performance evaluations of machine learning system
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Comparison of all classifiers over different FST’s based on RI for O1
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Comparison of all classifiers over different FST’s based on RI for O2
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Comparison of our proposed method against the existing methods in literature. RED arrows shows the proposed work

References

    1. Muntner P, Colantonio LD, Cushman M, Goff DC, Howard G, Howard VJ, Safford MM. Validation of the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease pooled cohort risk equations. JAMA. 2014;311(14):1406–1415. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2630. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(Supplement 1):S81–S90. doi: 10.2337/dc14-S081. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bharath C, Saravanan N, Venkatalakshmi S. Assessment of knowledge related to diabetes mellitus among patients attending a dental college in Salem city-A cross sectional study. Braz. Dent. Sci. 2017;20(3):93–100.
    1. Fitzmaurice C, Allen C, Barber RM, Barregard L, Bhutta ZA, Brenner H, Fleming T. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(4):524–548. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Danaei G, Finucane MM, Lu Y, Singh GM, Cowan MJ, Paciorek CJ, Rao M. National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2.7 million participants. Lancet. 2011;378(9785):31–40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60679-X. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms