Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 11;18(1):94.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1715-3.

Effectiveness and safety of moderate-intensity aerobic water exercise during pregnancy for reducing use of epidural analgesia during labor: protocol for a randomized clinical trial

Affiliations

Effectiveness and safety of moderate-intensity aerobic water exercise during pregnancy for reducing use of epidural analgesia during labor: protocol for a randomized clinical trial

Araceli Navas et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Epidural analgesia during labor can provide effective pain relief, but can also lead to adverse effects. The practice of moderate exercise during pregnancy is associated with an increased level of endorphins in the blood, and this could also provide pain relief during labor. Aerobic water exercises, rather than other forms of exercise, do not negatively impact articulations, reduce edema, blood pressure, and back pain, and increase diuresis. We propose a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a moderate water exercise program during pregnancy on the need for epidural analgesia during labor.

Methods: A multi-center, parallel, randomized, evaluator blinded, controlled trial in a primary care setting. We will randomised 320 pregnant women (14 to 20 weeks gestation) who have low risk of complications to a moderate water exercise program or usual care.

Discussion: The findings of this research will contribute toward understanding of the effects of a physical exercise program on pain and the need for analgesia during labor.

Trial registration: ISRCTN Registry identifier: 14097513 register on 04 September 2017. Retrospectively registered.

Keywords: Caesarian; Delivery; Epidural anesthesia; Exercise; Natural childbirth; Postnatal depression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Consent for publication

Non aplicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design and timeline

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Glosten B. Epidural and spinal analgesia/anesthesia:local anesthetic techniques. In: DH C, editor. Obstetric anaesthesia. 2. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999. pp. 360–386.
    1. Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Jones L. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;12:CD000331. - PubMed
    1. Howell CJ, Kidd C, Roberts W, Upton P, Lucking L, Jones PW, Johanson RB. A randomised controlled trial of epidural compared with non-epidural analgesia in labour. BJOG. 2001;108(1):27–33. - PubMed
    1. Khor LJH, Jeskins G, Cooper GM, Paterson-Brown S. National obstetric anaesthetic practice in the UK 1997/1998. Anaesthesia. 2000;55(12):1168–1172. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01720.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Declercq ER, Sakala C, Corry MP, Applebaum S. Listening to mothers II: report of the second National U.S. survey of Women’s childbearing experiences: conducted January-February 2006 for childbirth connection by Harris interactive(R) in partnership with Lamaze international. J Perinat Educ. 2007;16(4):9–14. doi: 10.1624/105812407X244769. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types