Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 11;18(1):474.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5284-1.

The public health emergency management system in China: trends from 2002 to 2012

Affiliations

The public health emergency management system in China: trends from 2002 to 2012

Mei Sun et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Public health emergencies have challenged the public health emergency management systems (PHEMSs) of many countries critically and frequently since this century. As the world's most populated country and the second biggest economy in the world, China used to have a fragile PHEMS; however, the government took forceful actions to build PHEMS after the 2003 SARS outbreak. After more than one decade's efforts, we tried to assess the improvements and problems of China's PHEMS between 2002 and 2012.

Methods: We conducted two rounds of national surveys and collected the data of the year 2002 and 2012, including all 32 provincial, 139 municipal, and 489 county CDCs. The municipal and county CDCs were selected by systematic random sampling. Twenty-one indicators of four stages (preparation, readiness, response and recovery) from the National Assessment Criteria for CDC Performance were chosen to assess the ten-year trends.

Results: At the preparation stage, organization, mechanisms, workforce, and stockpile across all levels and regions were significantly improved after one decade's efforts. At the readiness stage, the capability for formulating an emergency plan was also significantly improved during the same period. At the response stage, internet-based direct reporting was 98.8%, and coping scores were nearly full points of ten in 2012. At the recovery stage, the capabilities were generally lower than expected.

Conclusions: Due to forceful leadership, sounder regulations, and intensive resources, China's PHEMS has been improved at the preparation, readiness, and response stages; however, the recovery stage was still weak and could not meet the requirements of crisis management and preventive governance. In addition, CDCs in the Western region and counties lagged behind in performance on most indicators. Future priorities should include developing the recovery stage, establishing a closed feedback loop, and strengthening the capabilities of CDCs in Western region and counties.

Keywords: China; Preparation; Public health emergency management system; Readiness; Recovery; Response; Trend.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee at the School of Public Health of Fudan University. The access to the survey data used in this study was approved by the National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China (the former Ministry of Health). This study didn’t involve human participants and there was no data collected from humans or animals. Consent to participate for patients were not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hu J, Zeng AZ, Zhao LA. Comparative study of public health emergency management. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2009;109:976–992. doi: 10.1108/02635570910982319. - DOI
    1. Cohen O, Feder-Bubis P, Bar-Dayan Y, et al. Promoting public health legal preparedness for emergencies: review of current trends and their relevance in light of the Ebola crisis. Glob Health Action. 2015;8:28871. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.28871. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lurie N, Wasserman J, Nelson CD. Public health preparedness: evolution or revolution? Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25(4):935–945. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.4.935. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. The sixty-eighth World Health Assembly. Switzerland, Geneva: World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/events/2015/wha68/en/. Accessed 16 Apr 2017.
    1. Liu PL, Guo Y, Qian X, et al. China’s distinctive engagement in global health. Lancet. 2014;384:793–804. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60725-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed