Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes Associated With Hypotensive Episodes Among Heart Failure Patients Receiving Sacubitril/Valsartan or Enalapril: The PARADIGM-HF Trial (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor With Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure)
- PMID: 29643067
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.004745
Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes Associated With Hypotensive Episodes Among Heart Failure Patients Receiving Sacubitril/Valsartan or Enalapril: The PARADIGM-HF Trial (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor With Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure)
Abstract
Background: In PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor With Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure), heart failure treatment with sacubitril/valsartan reduced the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization compared with enalapril but resulted in more symptomatic hypotension. Concern on hypotension may be limiting use of sacubitril/valsartan in appropriate patients.
Methods and results: We characterized patients in PARADIGM-HF by whether they reported hypotension during study run-in periods (enalapril, followed by sacubitril/valsartan) and after randomization and assessed whether hypotension modified the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan. Of the 10 513 patients entering the enalapril run-in, 136 (1.3%) experienced hypotension and 93 (68%) were unable to continue to the next phase; of 9419 patients entering the sacubitril/valsartan run-in period, 228 (2.4%) patients experienced hypotension and 51% were unable to successfully complete the run-in. After randomization, 388 (9.2%) participants had 501 hypotensive events with enalapril, and 588 (14.0%) participants had 803 hypotensive events with sacubitril/valsartan (P<0.001). There was no difference between randomized treatment groups in the number of participants who discontinued therapy because of hypotension. Individuals with a hypotensive event in either group were older, had lower blood pressure at randomization, and were more likely to have an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Participants with hypotensive events during run-in who were ultimately randomized derived similar efficacy from sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril as those without hypotensive events (P interaction>0.90).
Conclusions: Hypotension was more common with sacubitril/valsartan relative to enalapril in PARADIGM-HF but did not differentially affect permanent discontinuations. Patients with hypotension during run-in derived similar benefit from sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril as those who did not experience hypotension.
Keywords: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; blood pressure; heart failure; hypotension; pharmacology.
© 2018 American Heart Association, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Systolic blood pressure, cardiovascular outcomes and efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: results from PARADIGM-HF.Eur Heart J. 2017 Apr 14;38(15):1132-1143. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw570. Eur Heart J. 2017. PMID: 28158398 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Influence of Ejection Fraction on Outcomes and Efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: The Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) Trial.Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Mar;9(3):e002744. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002744. Circ Heart Fail. 2016. PMID: 26915374 Clinical Trial.
-
Angioedema in heart failure patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) or enalapril in the PARADIGM-HF study.Int J Cardiol. 2018 Aug 1;264:118-123. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.03.121. Int J Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29776559 Clinical Trial.
-
Sacubitril/valsartan: An important piece in the therapeutic puzzle of heart failure.Rev Port Cardiol. 2017 Sep;36(9):655-668. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2016.11.013. Epub 2017 Aug 23. Rev Port Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28844335 Review. English, Portuguese.
-
Combined Angiotensin Receptor Antagonism and Neprilysin Inhibition.Circulation. 2016 Mar 15;133(11):1115-24. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018622. Circulation. 2016. PMID: 26976916 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Sacubitril/Valsartan in Heart Failure with Hypertension Patients: Real-World Experiences on Different Ages, Drug Doses, and Renal Functions.High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2023 Nov;30(6):561-572. doi: 10.1007/s40292-023-00606-0. Epub 2023 Nov 18. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2023. PMID: 37979031
-
Five Years of Sacubitril/Valsartan-a Safety Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials and Real-World Pharmacovigilance.Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2022 Oct;36(5):915-924. doi: 10.1007/s10557-021-07210-1. Epub 2021 Jun 14. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2022. PMID: 34125356
-
Rapid evidence-based sequencing of foundational drugs for heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction.Eur J Heart Fail. 2021 Jun;23(6):882-894. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2149. Epub 2021 May 7. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021. PMID: 33704874 Free PMC article. Review.
-
New drugs: big changes in conservative heart failure therapy?Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Jun 1;55(Suppl 1):i3-i10. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy421. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019. PMID: 31106335 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sacubitril/valsartan in Heart Failure and Beyond-From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Relevance.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jun 24;23(7):238. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2307238. eCollection 2022 Jul. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 39076908 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous