Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Apr 10;8(4):e019650.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019650.

Femoral Nerve Block Intervention in Neck of Femur Fracture (FINOF): a randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Femoral Nerve Block Intervention in Neck of Femur Fracture (FINOF): a randomised controlled trial

Martin Rowlands et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: Fractured neck of femur is a severely painful condition with significant mortality and morbidity. We investigated whether early and continuous use of femoral nerve block can improve pain on movement and mobility after surgery in older participants with fragility neck of femur fracture.

Design: Prospective single-centre, randomised controlled pragmatic trial.

Setting: Secondary care, acute National Health Service Trust, UK.

Participants: Participants admitted with a history and examination suggesting fractured neck of femur.

Intervention: Immediate continuous femoral nerve block via catheter or standard analgesia.

Outcome measures: Primary outcome measures were Cumulative Dynamic Pain score and Cumulated Ambulation Score from surgery until day 3 postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures included pain scores at rest, cumulative side effects (nausea and constipation), quality of life (measured by EuroQOL 5 D instrument (EQ-5D) score) at day 3 and day 30, and rehabilitation outcome (measured by mobility score).

Results: 141 participants were recruited, with 23 excluded. No significant difference was detected between Cumulative Dynamic Pain Score (standard care (n=56) vs intervention (n=55) 20 (IQR 15-24) vs 20 (15-23), p=0.51) or Cumulated Ambulation Score (standard care vs intervention 6 (5-9) vs 7 (5-10), p=0.76). There were no statistically different differences in secondary outcomes except cumulative pain at rest: 5 (0.5-6.5) in the standard care group and 2 (0-5) in the intervention group (p=0.043).

Conclusions: Early application of continuous femoral nerve block compared with standard systemic analgesia did not result in improved dynamic pain score or superior postoperative ambulation. This technique may provide superior pain relief at rest. Continuous femoral nerve block did not delay initial control of pain or mobilisation after surgery.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN92946117; Pre-results.

Keywords: femoral nerve block; hip fracture; older people; pain control; regional anaesthesia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials flow diagram.

References

    1. NHFD. Annual report. 2017. http://www.nhfd.co.uk/20/hipfractureR.nsf/docs/2017Report (accessed on 30 Oct 2017).
    1. Haentjens P, Magaziner J, Colón-Emeric CS, et al. . Meta-analysis: excess mortality after hip fracture among older women and men. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:380–90. 10.7326/0003-4819-152-6-201003160-00008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marufu TC, White SM, Griffiths R, et al. . Prediction of 30-day mortality after hip fracture surgery by the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score and the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool. Anaesthesia 2016;71:515–21. 10.1111/anae.13418 - DOI - PubMed
    1. White SM, Moppett IK, Griffiths R, et al. . Secondary analysis of outcomes after 11,085 hip fracture operations from the prospective UK Anaesthesia Sprint Audit of Practice (ASAP-2). Anaesthesia 2016;71:506–14. 10.1111/anae.13415 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parsons N, Griffin XL, Achten J, et al. . Outcome assessment after hip fracture: is EQ-5D the answer? Bone Joint Res 2014;3:69–75. 10.1302/2046-3758.33.2000250 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances