Formulation of a multivariate predictive model for difficult intubation: A double blinded prospective study
- PMID: 29643625
- PMCID: PMC5885451
- DOI: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_230_16
Formulation of a multivariate predictive model for difficult intubation: A double blinded prospective study
Abstract
Background and aims: Various models were devised for prediction of difficult intubation but have low positive predictive value, sensitivity and specificity. We aimed to predict difficult intubation from various airway predictive indices, in isolation and combination, and to formulate a multivariate model that can aid in accurate prediction of difficult intubation.
Material and methods: A prospective double blinded study was conducted on 500 adult patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia. Preoperatively, they were assessed for airway screening tests. After standardized induction of anaesthesia, laryngoscopic view was classified according to the Modified Cormack and Lehane (MCL) classification. Variables' association with intubation findings was evaluated using Chi-square statistic. Stepwise logistic regression identified the multivariate independent predictors of difficult intubation and combinations were made using forward selection process. 8 models were formulated and a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve worked out for them. Sensitivity and specificity analysis validated the final model.
Results: Age, sex, weight, BMI, snoring, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), diabetes, hypertension, upper lip bite test (ULBT), Mallampati grade (MPS), thyromental distance (TMD), sternomental distance (SMD), neck movements (NM), neck circumference (NC) and inter-incisor gap (IIG) had significant correlation with difficult intubation. Based upon sensitivity and specificity analysis, model comprising of MPS, NM, NC and SMD was found to be most accurate. It had highest sensitivity 80%, specificity 87% and area under curve 0.90, thus validating the model.
Conclusions: Our study found that a combination of MPS, SMD, NM and NC permits reliable, accurate and quick preoperative prediction of difficult intubation.
Keywords: Airway assessment; difficult intubation; predictive tests; upper lip bite test.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Cook TM, Scott S, Milhai R. Litigation related to airway and respiratory complications of anaesthesia: An analysis of claims against the NHS in England 1995-2007. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:556–63. - PubMed
-
- Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C. Major complications of airway management in the UK: Results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106:617–31. - PubMed
-
- Karkouti K, Rose DK, Wrigglesworth D, Cohen MM. Predicting difficult intubation; a multivariable analysis. Can J Anesth. 2000;47:730–9. - PubMed
-
- El-Gangouri AR, Mc carthy kennethr J, Thnan J, Frik and Anthony T, Ivankovich D. Preoperative airway assessment: Predictive value of a multivariate index. Anesth Analg. 1996;82:1197–204. - PubMed
-
- Naguib M, Scamman FL, O’ Sullivan C, Aker J, Ross AF, Kosmach S, Ensor JE. Predictive Performance of Three Multivariate Difficult Tracheal Intubation Models: A Double Blind case controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:818–24. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
