Correlation of tibial bone defect shape with patient demographics following total knee revision
- PMID: 29643692
- PMCID: PMC5889696
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.03.025
Correlation of tibial bone defect shape with patient demographics following total knee revision
Abstract
Background: Bone defects of the proximal tibia following revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are challenging to manage, but must be addressed to provide lasting stability. This paper will categorize tibial bone defects into shape groups and correlate resulting groups to patient demographic data.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of four hundred and four patients post revision TKA between January 2005 and February 2014 was conducted. One hundred and eighteen met the inclusion criteria and were subcategorized by defect shape on their post-operative lateral and anterior-posterior (AP) radiographs. The subgroups of defect shape were subsequently analyzed with Fisher's exact test and one way ANOVA.
Results: Trapezoidal shaped defects were the most common in both radiographic views, and the magnitude of the defect at the top joint line varied significantly amongst shape groups in both AP and lateral views. Trapezoid shaped defects were correlated with smaller defect top lengths in both views. There was no statistical correlation between defect shape BMI, TIV and reason for revision in lateral view. However, T-bilateral defect shapes were correlated with higher BMIs in AP view.
Conclusion: A volumetric classification system of tibial defects is necessary for preoperative planning in revision TKA. Common tibial bone defect shape groups were identified and analyzed in AP and lateral radiographs after revision TKA. Trapezoidal defects were the most common, and all other shapes followed a pattern of proximal enlargement tapering distally. Trapezoidal defects were smaller than other shapes and AP T-bilateral shaped defects were correlated with higher BMIs.
Keywords: Bone loss; Revision TKA; Revision total knee arthroplasty; Tibial bone defect.
Figures
References
-
- Kurtz S., Ong K., Lau E., Mowat F., Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2007;89:780–785. - PubMed
-
- Saleh K.J., Santos E.R., Ghomrawi H.M., Parvizi J., Mulhall K.J. Socioeconomic issues and demographics of total knee arthroplasty revision. Clin Orthop. 2006;446:15–21. - PubMed
-
- Gioe T.J., Killeen K.K., Grimm K., Mehle S., Scheltema K. Why are total knee replacements revised? Analysis of early revision in a community knee implant registry. Clin Orthop. 2004;428:100–106. - PubMed
-
- Schroer W.C., Berend K.R., Lombardi A.V. Why are total knees failing today? Etiology of total knee revision in 2010 and 2011. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:116–119. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous