Corrigendum: The Reality of Myoelectric Prostheses: Understanding What Makes These Devices Difficult for Some Users to Control

Affiliations

Published Erratum

Alix Chadwell et al. Front Neurorobot. 2018.

. 2018 Apr 3:12:15.

doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2018.00015. eCollection 2018.

¹ Centre for Health Sciences Research, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom.

Abstract

[This corrects the article on p. 7 in vol. 10, PMID: 27597823.].

Keywords: activity monitoring; control; functionality assessment; myoelectric; prosthesis; upper limb.

The Reality of Myoelectric Prostheses: Understanding What Makes These Devices Difficult for Some Users to Control.
Chadwell A, Kenney L, Thies S, Galpin A, Head J. Chadwell A, et al. Front Neurorobot. 2016 Aug 22;10:7. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2016.00007. eCollection 2016. Front Neurorobot. 2016. PMID: 27597823 Free PMC article.

1. Actigraph Corp (2015). ActiGraph White Paper: What Is a Count? Pensacola, FL.
1. Bailey R. R., Klaesner J. W., Lang C. E. (2015). Quantifying real-world upper-limb activity in nondisabled adults and adults with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 29, 969–978. 10.1177/1545968315583720 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
1. Brown B. B., Werner C. M. (2008). Using accelerometer feedback to identify walking destinations, activity overestimates, and stealth exercise in obese and nonobese individuals. J. Phys. Act. Health 5, 882–893. - PubMed
1. Gallagher P., MacLachlan M. (2000). Development and psychometric evaluation of the trinity amputation and prosthesis experience scales (TAPES). Rehabil. Psychol. 45, 130–154. 10.1037/0090-5550.45.2.130 - DOI
1. Metcalf C., Adams J., Burridge J., Yule V., Chappell P. (2007). A review of clinical upper limb assessments within the framework of the WHO ICF. Musculoskeletal. Care 5, 160–173. 10.1002/msc.108 - DOI - PubMed