Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Mar 21:14:63-69.
doi: 10.2174/1745017901814010063. eCollection 2018.

Colorectal Cancer Screening: The Role of Psychological, Social and Background Factors in Decision-making Process

Giulia Cossu  1 , Luca Saba  2 , Luigi Minerba  1 , Mario Mascalchi  3
Affiliations
Review

Colorectal Cancer Screening: The Role of Psychological, Social and Background Factors in Decision-making Process

Giulia Cossu et al. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. .

Abstract

Since ColoRectal Cancer (CRC) remains the third cause of cancer death in the world, a better understanding of the reasons underlying poor adherence to and delay in undergoing CRC screening programs is important. CRC screening decision-making process can be conceptualized as the relationship between intention and behavior and needs to be investigated including the impact on patients' decision of a broad range of psychological factors and personal predisposition as fear of a positive screening test, poor understanding of the procedure, psychological distress, anxiety, anticipation of pain, feelings of embarrassment and vulnerability. Also socioeconomic, ethnic and sociological influences, and organizational barriers have been identified as factors influencing CRC screening adherence. Decision-making process can finally be influenced by the healthcare background in which the intervention is promoted and screening programs are carried out. However, there is still a gap on the scientific knowledge about the influences of diverse elements on screening adherence and this deserves further investigations in order to carry out more focused and effective prevention programs.

Keywords: Barriers; Cancer fear; Cancer screening; Cancer worry; Colorectal cancer; Compliance; Embarrassment; Health anxiety; Risk perception.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Torre L.A., Bray F., Siegel R.L., Ferlay J., Lortet-Tieulent J., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gandomani H.S., Aghajani M., Mohammadian-Hafshejani A., Tarazoj A.A., Pouyesh V., Salehiniya H. Colorectal cancer in the world: Incidence, mortality and risk factors. Biomed. Res. Ther. 2017;4(10):1656–1675. doi: 10.15419/bmrat.v4i10.372. - DOI
    1. Smith R.A., Cokkinides V., Brawley O.W. Cancer screening in the United States, 2009: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2009;59(1):27–41. doi: 10.3322/caac.20008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lieberman D.A., Rex D.K., Winawer S.J., Giardiello F.M., Johnson D.A., Levin T.R. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: A consensus update by the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143(3):844–857. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.06.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ruco A., Stock D., Hilsden R.J., McGregor S.E., Paszat L.F., Saskin R., Rabeneck L. Evaluation of a risk index for advanced proximal neoplasia of the colon. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2015;81(6):1427–1432. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.028. - DOI - PubMed