Reconstructive Management Pearls for the Transgender Patient
- PMID: 29644476
- DOI: 10.1007/s11934-018-0795-y
Reconstructive Management Pearls for the Transgender Patient
Abstract
Purpose of review: A growing number of transgender patients are seeking gender-affirming genital reconstructive surgery (GRS). These complex procedures have high complication rates. We describe common surgical pitfalls in GRS and approaches for minimizing complications.
Recent findings: Penile inversion vaginoplasty has been associated with excellent cosmetic and functional outcomes. A robotic-assisted dissection may minimize risk of rectal injury. As a younger transgender population chooses pubertal suppression, alternative sources for lining the vaginal canal, such as enteric vaginoplasties, may be more widely utilized. Since adoption of microvascular techniques in phalloplasty, transmasculine individuals have potential for a sensate neophallus and penetrative intercourse. Urethral complications are common and challenging to manage; techniques using flap coverage may minimize ischemia-related strictures. Innovations in prosthesis placement require adaptations to neophallus anatomy. A growing number of transgender individuals are seeking genital reconstruction. Ongoing innovation in surgical technique is needed to improve patient outcomes.
Keywords: Penile prosthesis; Phalloplasty; Transgender; Urethral stricture; Vaginoplasty.
Similar articles
-
The Surgical Techniques and Outcomes of Secondary Phalloplasty After Metoidioplasty in Transgender Men: An International, Multi-Center Case Series.J Sex Med. 2019 Nov;16(11):1849-1859. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.07.027. Epub 2019 Sep 18. J Sex Med. 2019. PMID: 31542350
-
Genital Gender-Affirming Surgery in Transgender Men in The Netherlands from 1989 to 2018: The Evolution of Surgical Care.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jan;145(1):153e-161e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006385. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020. PMID: 31881624
-
Genital Reconstructive Surgery in Male to Female Transgender Patients: A Systematic Review of Primary Surgical Techniques, Complication Profiles, and Functional Outcomes from 1950 to Present Day.Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Mar;7(2):464-471. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.01.004. Epub 2020 Feb 13. Eur Urol Focus. 2021. PMID: 32061539
-
"Staging" in Phalloplasty.Urol Clin North Am. 2019 Nov;46(4):581-590. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2019.07.011. Urol Clin North Am. 2019. PMID: 31582031 Review.
-
Masculinizing Genital Gender Confirmation Surgery.Sex Med Rev. 2019 Jan;7(1):141-155. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Aug 16. Sex Med Rev. 2019. PMID: 30122339 Review.
Cited by
-
Transfeminine Gender Confirmation Surgery with Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty: An Initial Experience.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 May 21;8(5):e2873. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002873. eCollection 2020 May. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020. PMID: 33133914 Free PMC article.
-
Decision making in metoidioplasty and phalloplasty gender-affirming surgery: a mixed methods study.J Sex Med. 2023 Jun 28;20(7):1032-1043. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdad063. J Sex Med. 2023. PMID: 37173118 Free PMC article.
-
Metoidioplasty and Phalloplasty Gender-Affirming Surgery and Association with Gender Congruence and Life Satisfaction: A Cross-Sectional Study.Transgend Health. 2025 Feb 10;10(1):35-43. doi: 10.1089/trgh.2023.0060. eCollection 2025 Feb. Transgend Health. 2025. PMID: 40151168
-
Genitourinary Complications of Gender-Affirming Surgery.Curr Urol Rep. 2019 Apr 30;20(6):31. doi: 10.1007/s11934-019-0894-4. Curr Urol Rep. 2019. PMID: 31041616 Review.
-
Piloting a Genital Affirmation Surgical Priorities Scale for Trans Masculine Patients.Transgend Health. 2019 Oct 25;4(1):270-276. doi: 10.1089/trgh.2019.0038. eCollection 2019. Transgend Health. 2019. PMID: 31656855 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials