Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Dec;47(8):869-883.
doi: 10.1007/s13280-018-1045-8. Epub 2018 Apr 11.

Exploring dynamism of cultural ecosystems services through a review of environmental education research

Affiliations
Review

Exploring dynamism of cultural ecosystems services through a review of environmental education research

Rachelle K Gould et al. Ambio. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

The field of cultural ecosystem services (CES) explores the non-material benefits that ecosystems provide to people. Human perceptions and valuations change, for many reasons and in many ways; research on CES, however, rarely accounts for this dynamism. In an almost entirely separate academic world, research on environmental education (EE) explores how EE programming affects peoples' attitudes and values toward the natural world. In this review of 119 EE research publications, we explore whether CES (and the adjacent concept of relational values) can be dynamic. We approach this via two lines of inquiry that explore whether EE may instigate this change. First, we investigate whether the EE community measures (and tries to affect) CES-related outcomes. Second, we ask: Has EE research detected changes in CES-related outcomes? We find the EE programs measure many CES outcomes (e.g., aesthetic appreciation, social connectedness), and that in most cases studies observe increases in these outcomes after EE experiences.

Keywords: Change; Measurement; Relational values; Social-ecological systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Number of manuscripts in our sample that addressed each outcome coded as a cultural ecosystem service. Shading denotes the proportion of studies that found increases in each outcome
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Number of manuscripts in our sample that addressed each outcome coded as a relational value. Shading denotes the proportion of studies that found increases in each outcome

References

    1. Adam F, Rončević B. Social capital: Recent debates and research trends. Social Science Information. 2003;42:155–183. doi: 10.1177/0539018403042002001. - DOI
    1. Ardoin NM, Biedenweg K, O’Connor K. Evaluation in residential environmental education: An applied literature review of intermediary outcomes. Applied Environmental Education & Communication. 2015;14:43–56. doi: 10.1080/1533015X.2015.1013225. - DOI
    1. Ballantyne R, Packer J. Introducing a fifth pedagogy: Experience-based strategies for facilitating learning in natural environments. Environmental Education Research. 2009;15:243–262. doi: 10.1080/13504620802711282. - DOI
    1. Basile CG. Environmental education as a catalyst for transfer of learning in young children. The Journal of Environmental Education. 2000;32:21–27. doi: 10.1080/00958960009598668. - DOI
    1. Baumgartner E, Zabin CJ. A case study of project-based instruction in the ninth grade: A semester-long study of intertidal biodiversity. Environmental Education Research. 2008;14:97–114. doi: 10.1080/13504620801951640. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources