Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 14;74(4):575-581.
doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly080.

Association of Frailty With Recovery From Disability Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Results From Two Large U.S. Cohorts

Affiliations

Association of Frailty With Recovery From Disability Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Results From Two Large U.S. Cohorts

Chenkai Wu et al. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Disability in activities of daily living (ADLs) is a dynamic process and transitions among different disability states are common. However, little is known about factors affecting recovery from disability. We examined the association between frailty and recovery from disability among nondisabled community-dwelling elders.

Methods: We studied 1,023 adults from the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) and 685 adults from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), who were ≥65 years and had incident disability, defined as having difficulty in ≥1 ADL (dressing, eating, toileting, bathing, transferring, walking across a room). Disability recovery was defined as having no difficulty in any ADLs. Frailty was assessed by slowness, weakness, exhaustion, inactivity, and shrinking. Persons were classified as "nonfrail" (0 criteria), "prefrail" (1-2 criteria), or "frail" (3-5 criteria).

Results: In total, 539 (52.7%) CHS participants recovered from disability within 1 year. Almost two-thirds of nonfrail persons recovered, while less than two-fifths of the frail recovered. In the HRS, 234 (34.2%) participants recovered from disability within 2 years. Approximately half of the nonfrail recovered, while less than one-fifth of the frail recovered. After adjustment, prefrail and frail CHS participants were 16% and 36% less likely to recover than the nonfrail, respectively. In the HRS, frail persons had a 41% lower likelihood of recovery than the nonfrail.

Conclusions: Frailty is an independent predictor of poor recovery from disability among nondisabled older adults. These findings validate frailty as a marker of decreased resilience and may offer opportunities for individualized interventions and geriatric care based on frailty assessment.

Keywords: Disablement process; Frailty; Recovery; Resilience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Proportions of recovery from disability by frailty status. Notes: Participants who died in the following visit after the onset of incident disability were included and considered not to recover. Participants who were alive but not interviewed in the following visit after the onset of incident disability were excluded. Recovery from disability was defined as no difficulty in any of six activities of daily living (dressing, eating, toileting, bathing, transferring, and walking across a room) within 1 year in the Cardiovascular Health Study and within 2 years in the Health and Retirement Study after the onset of disability.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Association of frailty and components of frailty with recovery from disability. Notes: Points estimates (unadjusted) are accompanied by 95% confidence intervals. Prefrailty and frailty were modeled simultaneously with nonfrail persons being the reference. Each of five binary frailty components (slowness, weakness, exhaustion, inactivity, and shrinking) were estimated separately. Two study cohorts were analyzed independently.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Freedman VA, Martin LG, Schoeni RF. Recent trends in disability and functioning among older adults in the United States: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002;288:3137–3146. doi:10.1001/jama.288.24.3137 - PubMed
    1. Fuller-Thomson E, Yu B, Nuru-Jeter A, Guralnik JM, Minkler M. Basic ADL disability and functional limitation rates among older Americans from 2000–2005: the end of the decline?J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009;64:1333–1336. doi:10.1093/gerona/glp130 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martin LG, Freedman VA, Schoeni RF, Andreski PM. Trends in disability and related chronic conditions among people ages fifty to sixty-four. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29:725–731. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2008.0746 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seeman TE, Merkin SS, Crimmins EM, Karlamangla AS. Disability trends among older Americans: national health and nutrition examination surveys, 1988–1994 and 1999–2004. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:100–107. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.157388 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hung WW, Ross JS, Boockvar KS, Siu AL. Recent trends in chronic disease, impairment and disability among older adults in the United States. BMC Geriatr. 2011;11:47. doi:10.1186/1471-2318-11-47 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types