Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 12;13(4):e0195757.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195757. eCollection 2018.

Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens in a German university medical center: Prevalence, clinical implications and the role of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations

Affiliations

Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens in a German university medical center: Prevalence, clinical implications and the role of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations

Juri Katchanov et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the spectrum of infections with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) and the clinical impact of the newly available betalactam/betalactamase inhibitor combinations ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam in a German academic tertiary care center.

Methods: Retrospective analysis.

Results: Between September 1, 2015 and August 31, 2016, 119 individual patients (0.22% of all hospital admissions) were colonized or infected with carbapenem-resistant MDR-GNB. The species distribution was Pseudomonas aeruginosa, n = 66; Enterobacteriaceae spp., n = 44; and Acinetobacter baumannii, n = 18. In 9 patients, carbapenem-resistant isolates belonging to more than one species were detected. Infection was diagnosed in 50 patients (total: 42.0%; nosocomial pneumonia: n = 23, 19.3%; bloodstream infection: n = 11, 9.2%). Antimicrobial treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics prior to detection of a carbapenem-resistant isolate was documented in 105 patients (88.2%, prior administration of carbapenems: 62.2%). Nosocomial transmission was documented in 29 patients (24.4%). In 26 patients (21.8%), at least one carbapenem-susceptible, third-generation cephalosporin non-susceptible isolate was documented prior to detection of a carbapenem-resistant isolate belonging to the same species (median 38 days, IQR 23-78). 12 patients (10.1%) had documented previous contact to the healthcare system in a country with high burden of carbapenemase-producing strains. Genes encoding carbapenemases were detected in 60/102 patient isolates (58.8%; VIM-2, n = 25; OXA-48, n = 21; OXA-23-like, n = 10). Susceptibility to colistin was 94.3%. Ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam were administered to 3 and 5 patients, respectively (in-hospital mortality: 66% and 100%). Development of drug-resistance under therapy was observed for both antimicrobials.

Conclusions: i) The major predisposing factors for acquisition of carbapenem-resistant MDR-GNB were selective pressure due to preceding antimicrobial therapy and nosocomial transmission. ii) Colistin remains the backbone of antimicrobial chemotherapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant MDR-GNB. iii) Novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations are of limited usefulness in our setting because of the high prevalence of Ambler class B carbapenemases and the emergence of nonsusceptibility under therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Distribution of MDR-GNB per hospital section.
Panel A: Departments, in which carbapenem-resistant MDR-GNB were isolated. Each affected patient was counted once per department. Panel B: Services that primarily cared for these patients. Each patient was counted once per service. A & E, accident and emergency; *excluding stem cell transplantation ward; **including hepatobiliary surgery.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Examples of strain typing results using pulse-field gel electrophoresis.
Panels A and B: Identical PFGE patterns generated from carbapenem-resistant MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (five individual patients A1-A5, panel A) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (five individual patients K1-K5, panel B) highly suggestive of nosocomial transmission. Panel C: Identical PFGE patterns of carbapenem-susceptible (P1) and carbapenem-resistant (P2) MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from the same patient (blood culture and bronchioalveolar lavage, respectively) exemplifying acquisition of carbapenem-resistance under therapy. The time span between detection of the carbapenem-susceptible and carbapenem-resistant isolate was 21 days. Abbreviations: M, DNA Marker; C, unrelated clinical control isolate (same species, obtained outside the study period).
Fig 3
Fig 3
Colistin minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for a) Klebsiella pneumoniae, b) Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and c) Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. Shown are non-duplicate isolates from individual patients. Dashed line: Clinical breakpoint according to EUCAST Breakpoint Table v.7.0 (MIC ≤ 2 mg/L, susceptible; MIC > 2 mg/L resistant).

References

    1. Grundmann H, Glasner C, Albiger B, Aanensen DM, Tomlinson CT, Andrasević AT, et al. Occurrence of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli in the European survey of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (EuSCAPE): a prospective, multinational study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17: 153–163. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30257-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Perez F, El Chakhtoura NG, Papp-Wallace KM, Wilson BM, Bonomo RA. Treatment options for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: can we apply “precision medicine” to antimicrobial chemotherapy? Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2016;17: 761–81. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2016.1145658 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Falagas ME, Lourida P, Poulikakos P, Rafailidis PI, Tansarli GS. Antibiotic treatment of infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: systematic evaluation of the available evidence. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58: 654–63. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01222-13 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Livermore DM, Mushtaq S, Meunier D, Hopkins KL, Hill R, Adkin R, et al. Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against surveillance and “problem” Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and non-fermenters from the British Isles. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017; doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx136 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carmeli Y, Armstrong J, Laud PJ, Newell P, Stone G, Wardman A, et al. Ceftazidime-avibactam or best available therapy in patients with ceftazidime-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa complicated urinary tract infections or complicated intra-abdominal infections (REPRISE): a randomised, pathogen-directed,. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16: 661–73. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30004-4 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms