Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;25(4):211-217.
doi: 10.1177/0969141318767471. Epub 2018 Apr 13.

Barriers to cervical screening and interest in self-sampling among women who actively decline screening

Affiliations

Barriers to cervical screening and interest in self-sampling among women who actively decline screening

Kirsty F Bennett et al. J Med Screen. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: Understanding why some women actively decline cervical screening could contribute to tailored intervention development. We explored reasons for non-participation in cervical screening among women who had made an active decision not to attend in the future. We also explored interest in human papillomavirus self-sampling.

Methods: In a population-based survey of women in Great Britain, home-based computer-assisted interviews were carried out with screening eligible women. Women reported their intention to attend for screening when next invited. They endorsed predefined barriers to screening and indicated their interest in human papillomavirus self-sampling.

Results: Women who had actively declined screening and those who intended to go but were currently overdue (n=543) were included in this analysis. Women who had made an active decision not to be screened in the future were more likely to endorse the barriers 'I have other more important things to worry about' and to perceive screening to be of low relevance based on their sexual behaviour. Most participants (70%) indicated that they would be interested in human papillomavirus self-sampling. Interest in self-sampling was greater among those who reported having had a bad experience of screening in the past, were too busy or embarrassed to attend, or would not want a man to carry out the test.

Conclusions: Women who had made an active decision not to attend screening felt it was of low relevance to them and that they had more important things to worry about. Shifting the perceived cost-benefit ratio for these women by offering human papillomavirus self-sampling might increase screening participation in this group.

Keywords: Cervical screening; barriers; decline; human papillomavirus sampling; informed; intention; non-attender.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Interest in self-sampling by endorsement of each barrier to screening.*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

References

    1. Public Health England. Cervical screening: Programme overview, 2015. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/cervical-screening-programme-overview
    1. Peto J, Gilham C, Fletcher O, et al. The cervical cancer epidemic that screening has prevented in the UK. Lancet 2004; 364: 249–256. - PubMed
    1. Screening & Immunisations Team. Cervical Screening Programme, England, 2016–17. NHS digital, 2017. Available at: https://digital.nhs.uk/media/33767/Cervical-Screening-Programme-England-...
    1. Waller J, Bartoszek M, Marlow L, et al. Barriers to cervical cancer screening attendance in England: a population-based survey. J Med Screen 2009; 16: 199–204. - PubMed
    1. Marlow LAV, Waller J, Wardle J. Barriers to cervical cancer screening among ethnic minority women: a qualitative study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2015; 41: 248–254. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types