Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Apr 12;17(1):40.
doi: 10.1186/s12938-018-0470-z.

Technologies to monitor the health of loaded skin tissues

Affiliations
Review

Technologies to monitor the health of loaded skin tissues

Dan L Bader et al. Biomed Eng Online. .

Abstract

There are many situations where the skin and underlying soft tissues are compromised by mechanical loading in the form or pressure, or pressure in combination with shear. If sustained, this can lead to damage in the tissues particularly adjacent to bony prominences, resulting in chronic wounds. An array of bioengineering technologies have been adopted to assess the integrity of loaded soft tissues. This paper aims to review these approaches for the quantification, simulation and early detection of mechanically-induced skin damage. The review considers different measurements at the interface between the skin and support surface/medical device, involving pressure, shear, friction and the local microclimate. The potential of the techniques to monitor the physiological response of the skin to these external stimuli including biophysical measurement devices and sampling of biofluids are critically analysed. In addition, it includes an analysis of medical imaging technologies and computational modelling to provide a means by which tissue deformation can be quantified and thresholds for tissue damage defined. Bioengineering measurement and imaging technologies have provided an insight into the temporal status of loaded skin. Despite the advances in technology, to date, the translation to clinical tools which are robust and cost effective has been limited. There is a need to adapt existing technologies and simulation platforms to enable patients, carers and clinicians to employ appropriate intervention strategies to minimise soft tissue damage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic of the intrinsic and extrinsic factors that predispose individuals to skin damage and the bioengineering measurement techniques which can monitor their tissue status. The numbers relate to the sections describing the different technologies
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Factors influencing tissue health at the boundary between the support surface and the skin surface
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a MRI of seated buttocks and b gluteal muscle subjected to maximum indenter displacement with highlighted markers [146]
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Conversion of CT stacked images (A) into a mesh containing tetrahedral elements (B). C Material properties are assigned to the model including skin (yellow), bone (blue), cartilage (green) and muscle (red). D Von Mises stress on the skin and medical device (respiratory mask)

References

    1. Briggaman RA, Wheeler CE., Jr The epidermal–dermal junction. J Investig Dermatol. 1975;65:71–84. - PubMed
    1. Pasparakis M, Haase I, Nestle FO. Mechanisms regulating skin immunity and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14:289–301. - PubMed
    1. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, Alliance PPPI . Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: quick reference guide. Osborne Park: Cambridge Media; 2014.
    1. Vanderwee K, Clark M, Dealey C, Gunningberg L, Defloor T. Pressure ulcer prevalence in Europe: a pilot study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2007;13:227–235. - PubMed
    1. Khanolkar MP, Bain SC, Stephens JW. The diabetic foot. QJM Int J Med. 2008;101:685–695. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources